Re: Requesting approval for URI schemes net.msmq, net.tcp, net.pipe

Dear Piyush,

imo, It would really be more appropriate for the members of the
community to (1) introduce the particular draft(s) specifying the
schemes and (2) mention the schemes' syntax and semantics clearly
rather than making reference to the protocol specification where that
could hardly be found.

Mykyta Yevstifeyev

2011/1/17, Piyush Joshi <Piyush.Joshi <at> microsoft.com>:
> This is to request approval for the following URI schemes. Please find the
> information below, requested as per the template defined in RFC4395.  Please
> let me know if you have any additional questions.
>
> URI scheme names
>
> 1)      net.msmq (to specify communication using .Net Message Framing
> protocol<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc219293(PROT.10).aspx>
> over Microsoft Message Queuing)
>
> 2)      net.tcp (to specify communication using .Net Message Framing
> protocol<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc219293(PROT.10).aspx>
> over TCP)
>
> 3)      net.pipe (to specify communication using .Net Message Framing
> protocol<http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc219293(PROT.10).aspx>
> over Microsoft Windows Named Pipe)
>
> References