Re: 'duri' and 'tdb' => Experimental (= Provisional registration)

On 1/22/12 6:25 PM, "Martin J. Dürst" wrote:
> On 2012/01/22 6:04, Larry Masinter wrote:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-masinter-dated-uri-10
> 
>> This has been kicking around for more than 10 years as an Internet Draft.
>>
>> I was asked at least for something more stable, and I want to take this
>>
>> off my queue.
> 
>> The URI scheme registry doesn't have an 'experimental' section, so I
>> think
>> these should be noted as 'provisional'.
> 
> My understanding is that they should be registered as provisional
> already at the moment an ID is submitted. For an experimental RFC, I
> think either provisional or permanent would be okay.
> 
> In any case, please move forward with this towards RFC.

I could still sponsor this during my time on the IESG, but I would need
a document shepherd, as well as a PROTO writeup in the next week. That
might be too tight a deadline.

Peter

--

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

_______________________________________________
Uri-review mailing list
Uri-review <at> ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uri-review