1 May 2012 00:59
Fwd: Re: [scim] SCIM Issues
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter <at> stpeter.im>
2012-04-30 22:59:05 GMT
2012-04-30 22:59:05 GMT
FYI, the nascent SCIM effort (seemingly likely to become a WG) might be a possible customer of vCard4... Peter -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM Issues Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 01:57:21 -0500 From: Morteza Ansari (moransar) <moransar <at> cisco.com> To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell <at> cs.tcd.ie>, Samuel Erdtman <samuel <at> erdtman.se> CC: Radovan Semancik <radovan.semancik <at> evolveum.com>, scim <at> ietf.org Stephen, Kelly answered this question much better than I could: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scim/current/msg00302.html The key reason for not using inetOrgPerson is the flat vs. complex data model. Having said that, I think the WG should evaluate and consider using other options like vCard4 which is a lot closer to the SCIM schema than any native LDAP schema. Cheers, Morteza -----Original Message----- From: scim-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 11:35 AM(Continue reading)
RSS Feed