Re: RFC5798 - clarification on checksum calculation

Forwarded.
Any other VRRPv3/IPv4 implementation?

Thanks,
Tomoyuki

Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 03:26:15 +0200
Subject: Re: [VRRP] RFC5798 - clarification on checksum calculation
From: Hermin Anggawijaya <hermin.anggawijaya <at> gmail.com>
To: Tomoyuki Sahara <sahara <at> surt.net>

Sahara-san

Thanks for your input.

Anyone else with either/other interpretation of the clause ?

Thanks

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Tomoyuki Sahara <sahara <at> surt.net> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Hermin Anggawijaya
> <hermin.anggawijaya <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>> Would someone be able to help clarifying RFC5798 Sec. 5.2.8 on
>> checksum for me please...
>> 
>> It says that
>> 
>>  "The checksum is the 16-bit one's complement of the one's complement