Hermin Anggawijaya | 15 May 2012 23:17
Picon

Fwd: RFC5798 - clarification on checksum calculation

Hello

I am thinking of submitting an errata for RFC 5798 Sec. 5.2.8 to make
it more precise in describing the checksum calculation for each address family.

But reading a few responses here, I gathered that there is no general
agreement as to the original intention of the text,
I believe that for IPv4, the checksum is calculated without
pseudo-header so that it is backward compatible with RFC 3768.

Any other opinions - particularly from original authors ?

Kind Regards

Hermin Anggawijaya

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:41 PM,  <kura <at> iij.ad.jp> wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> Has there been any progress with regard to this topic?
> I know that in an implementation of VRRPv3 for IPv4 the checksum
> is calculated without pseudo-header currently, but I believe that
> pseudo-header should be involved in the calculation as same as
> IPv6 case.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Tomohiko Kurahashi <kura <at> iij.ad.jp>
>
>
(Continue reading)

Nair, Anoop Govindan | 17 May 2012 06:13
Picon
Favicon

Re: Fwd: RFC5798 - clarification on checksum calculation

My interpretation of the specification is that for IPv4 checksum is calculated without pseudo-header.

It would be nice if RFC authors can clarify.

Regards,

-----Original Message-----
From: vrrp-bounces <at> ietf.org [mailto:vrrp-bounces <at> ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hermin Anggawijaya
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2012 2:47 AM
To: vrrp <at> ietf.org
Subject: [VRRP] Fwd: RFC5798 - clarification on checksum calculation

Hello

I am thinking of submitting an errata for RFC 5798 Sec. 5.2.8 to make
it more precise in describing the checksum calculation for each address family.

But reading a few responses here, I gathered that there is no general
agreement as to the original intention of the text,
I believe that for IPv4, the checksum is calculated without
pseudo-header so that it is backward compatible with RFC 3768.

Any other opinions - particularly from original authors ?

Kind Regards

Hermin Anggawijaya

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 2:41 PM,  <kura <at> iij.ad.jp> wrote:
> Hello list,
(Continue reading)


Gmane