headers
Peter Saint-Andre | 2 Mar 2012 05:06
Favicon

Minutes of the W3C/IETF Coordination Call, 2012-02-28

Minutes of the W3C/IETF Coordination Call
2012-02-28

Participants:

Stephen Farrell (SF)
John Klensin (JCK)
Philippe Le Hegaret (PLH)
Mark Nottingham (MNOT)
Pete Resnick (PR)
Peter Saint-Andre (PSA)
Robert Sparks (RJS)
Thomas Roessler (TLR)

Agenda:

1. HTTP/2.0 / recharter of IETF HTTPBIS WG
2. Web authentication (see lively discussion triggered by #1)
3. Concerns about the "CA system"
4. IETF IRI WG / W3C i18n Core WG / URL processing spec
5. WebSocket extensions / HYBI WG recharter
6. Update on work in IETF WebSec WG and W3C WebAppSec WG
7. SIP provider identity - does it matter for WebRTC?
8. Crypto API chartering, Identity meetings in Paris
9. Paris IETF / IAB plenary
10. Next meeting
11. Any Other Business

Notes:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Larry Masinter | 2 Mar 2012 09:24
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

FW: Minutes of the W3C/IETF Coordination Call, 2012-02-28

Besides me, what other TAG members will be at IETF in Paris?

What coordination should we be doing there, if any?

Note minutes of W3C/IETF coordination group mentions TAG possibilities:


-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpeter <at> stpeter.im] 
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2012 8:07 PM
To: public-ietf-w3c <at> w3.org
Subject: Minutes of the W3C/IETF Coordination Call, 2012-02-28

Minutes of the W3C/IETF Coordination Call
2012-02-28

Participants:

Stephen Farrell (SF)
John Klensin (JCK)
Philippe Le Hegaret (PLH)
Mark Nottingham (MNOT)
Pete Resnick (PR)
Peter Saint-Andre (PSA)
Robert Sparks (RJS)
Thomas Roessler (TLR)

Agenda:

1. HTTP/2.0 / recharter of IETF HTTPBIS WG 2. Web authentication (see lively discussion triggered by #1) 3.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Stefan Hakansson LK | 2 Mar 2012 14:55
Picon
Favicon

Re: Minutes of the W3C/IETF Coordination Call, 2012-02-28

On 03/02/2012 05:06 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> Minutes of the W3C/IETF Coordination Call
[snip]
>
> 8. W3C Crypto API

In the agenda there was also a part on "Identity meetings in Paris".

>
> TLR: WG is under review by Advisory Community, still working to find an
> additional co-chair. Expect approved charter in relatively near future.
> Other issue is relationship to OAuth, OpenID Connect, possibility for
> additional and broader work. Side meeting at IETF 83 in Paris.
>
> SF: Scheduled on the Thursday lunch break (1130-1300) in room 252A, just
> before the OAuth WG session.
>
> PSA: Stephen, do you see any coordination issues from the IETF side?
>
> SF: Definitely interest in seeing crypto in the browsers. Existence of
> such an API could have an impact in the future on OAuth design etc.
>
> TLR: Also note OpenID connect meeting Sunday, overlapping with training
> sessions

I would like to bring to the attention that the IETF rtcweb WG has 
developed a proposal for enabling tying an Identity Provider into a RTC 
session. Look at e.g. 
<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch/?include_text=1>. 
In the current agenda proposal this is to be discussed at the Wed rtcweb
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Thomas Roessler | 2 Mar 2012 15:59
Picon
Favicon

Re: Minutes of the W3C/IETF Coordination Call, 2012-02-28

Thanks, Stefan, for the heads-up; I hope that Harry Halpin and Wendy Seltzer, who are working on crypto APIs
and identity related topics for us, will be able to attend that session

To add some context, the proposal currently under review is specifically for crypto APIs.  That seemed a
well-enough defined piece of work to just move ahead with it.  We're still looking into what exact piece of
"identity" related work would be useful for us to take up.  Hence the side session in Paris.

--
Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr <at> w3.org>  ( <at> roessler)

On 2012-03-02, at 14:55 +0100, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote:

> On 03/02/2012 05:06 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> Minutes of the W3C/IETF Coordination Call
> [snip]
>> 
>> 8. W3C Crypto API
> 
> In the agenda there was also a part on "Identity meetings in Paris".
> 
>> 
>> TLR: WG is under review by Advisory Community, still working to find an
>> additional co-chair. Expect approved charter in relatively near future.
>> Other issue is relationship to OAuth, OpenID Connect, possibility for
>> additional and broader work. Side meeting at IETF 83 in Paris.
>> 
>> SF: Scheduled on the Thursday lunch break (1130-1300) in room 252A, just
>> before the OAuth WG session.
>> 
>> PSA: Stephen, do you see any coordination issues from the IETF side?
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Stefan Hakansson LK | 2 Mar 2012 18:04
Picon
Favicon

Re: Minutes of the W3C/IETF Coordination Call, 2012-02-28

On 03/02/2012 03:59 PM, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> Thanks, Stefan, for the heads-up; I hope that Harry Halpin and Wendy
> Seltzer, who are working on crypto APIs and identity related topics
> for us, will be able to attend that session
>
> To add some context, the proposal currently under review is
> specifically for crypto APIs.  That seemed a well-enough defined
> piece of work to just move ahead with it.  We're still looking into
> what exact piece of "identity" related work would be useful for us to
> take up.  Hence the side session in Paris.

I would be interested in listening in, if possible.

My personal view is that it would be good if rtcweb/webrtc would not end 
up in a one-off solution; if there will be a broader Identity effort in 
W3C it would be good if rtcweb/webrtc can use it.

Br,
Stefan

>
> -- Thomas Roessler, W3C<tlr <at> w3.org>   ( <at> roessler)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2012-03-02, at 14:55 +0100, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote:
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Thomas Roessler | 2 Mar 2012 18:07
Picon
Favicon

Re: Minutes of the W3C/IETF Coordination Call, 2012-02-28

On 2012-03-02, at 18:04 +0100, Stefan Hakansson LK wrote:

>> To add some context, the proposal currently under review is
>> specifically for crypto APIs.  That seemed a well-enough defined
>> piece of work to just move ahead with it.  We're still looking into
>> what exact piece of "identity" related work would be useful for us to
>> take up.  Hence the side session in Paris.
> 
> I would be interested in listening in, if possible.

You're more than welcome to not just listen in, but join and participate!

> My personal view is that it would be good if rtcweb/webrtc would not end up in a one-off solution; if there
will be a broader Identity effort in W3C it would be good if rtcweb/webrtc can use it.

+1
Permalink | Reply |

Gmane