RE: Ordered collections and versioned collections

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request <at> w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request <at> w3.org]On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault
> Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 10:47 PM
> To: Webdav WG
> Subject: Ordered collections and versioned collections
>
>
>
>
> It seems from draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protocol-07 that only
> version-controlled resources are part of the ordering of
> version-controlled collections (Section 9: "for compatibility with
> RFC3253, only the ordering of version-controlled members needs to be
> maintained")

The full context being:

"This specification considers both the ordering type (DAV:ordering-type
property) and the ordering of collection members to be part of the state of
a collection. Therefore both MUST be recorded upon CHECKIN or
VERSION-CONTROL, and both MUST be restored upon CHECKOUT, UNCHECKOUT or
UPDATE (where for compatibility with RFC3253, only the ordering of
version-controlled members needs to be maintained)."

> Does that mean there's no way to order versioned and unversioned
> resources together within a version-controlled collection?

Nope. It's supposed to mean that you *can* order both types of resources
within a versioned-controlled collection, but collection *versions* will