Handling XML objects in MIME

Kazuyuki Ashimura | 10 May 2012 18:28

Request for review of EmotionML media type: application/emotionml+xml


Dear list,

W3C has just published a Candidate Recommendation for "Emotion Markup
Language (EmotionML)" at:

  http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-emotionml-20120510/

I am sending this request to ask the Ietf-types list for comments on
the Media Type section of the EmotionML specification following the
procedure defined at:

  http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype

---
The Media Type section of the EmotionML specification is available
at:

  http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-emotionml-20120510/#MIME-type

and a plain text copy is also available below.

MIME media type name:
---------------------
     application

MIME subtype name:
------------------
     emotionml+xml

(Continue reading)

headers

Bjoern Hoehrmann | 11 May 2012 03:22

Re: Request for review of EmotionML media type: application/emotionml+xml

* Kazuyuki Ashimura wrote:
>W3C has just published a Candidate Recommendation for "Emotion Markup
>Language (EmotionML)" at:
>
>  http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-emotionml-20120510/
>
>I am sending this request to ask the Ietf-types list for comments on
>the Media Type section of the EmotionML specification following the
>procedure defined at:
>
>  http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype

The procedure requires Working Groups to ask for ietf-types review when
making a Last Call announcement. I have not been able to find any such
request in the archive. If the Working Group failed to follow the pro-
cedure, it would be helpful if you could put that on the record.

>MIME media type name:
>---------------------
>     application

This is using an outdated template. The current one is in RFC 4288. In
it, some field names are different and some fields are organized in a
different manner.

>Optional parameters:
>--------------------
>     charset
>
>         This parameter has identical semantics to the charset parameter

(Continue reading)

headers

Kazuyuki Ashimura | 24 May 2012 01:35

Re: Request for review of EmotionML media type: application/emotionml+xml

Hi Bjoern,

Thank you very much for your thoughtful comments.  And very sorry for
the delay.  I was on business travel for a while, and got some trouble
with sending emails after that.

Could you please see inline below for my response?

On 05/11/2012 10:22 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
 >
 > * Kazuyuki Ashimura wrote:
 >> W3C has just published a Candidate Recommendation for "Emotion Markup
 >> Language (EmotionML)" at:
 >>
 >>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-emotionml-20120510/
 >>
 >> I am sending this request to ask the Ietf-types list for comments on
 >> the Media Type section of the EmotionML specification following the
 >> procedure defined at:
 >>
 >>   http://www.w3.org/2002/06/registering-mediatype
 >
 > The procedure requires Working Groups to ask for ietf-types review when
 > making a Last Call announcement. I have not been able to find any such
 > request in the archive. If the Working Group failed to follow the pro-
 > cedure, it would be helpful if you could put that on the record.

Sorry but as you pointed out we failed to send out a review request
when we published the Last Call Working Draft.

(Continue reading)