Paolo Del Bene | 9 Apr 2012 00:46
Picon

is zfs incompatible with the GNU Project ?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paolo Delbene <id3rfix <at> gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 21:09:24 +0100
Subject: Re: Bug#651624: is zfs incompatible with the GNU Project ?
To: Christoph Egger <christoph <at> debian.org>, 651624 <at> bugs.debian.org
Cc: Robert Millan <rmh <at> debian.org>, debian-bsd <at> lists.debian.org

 Paolo Delbene
<id3rfix <at> gmail.com> 	07 febbraio 2012 02:47
A: debian-bsd <debian-bsd <at> lists.debian.org>

Hi,

For that i know the GNU Project is based on the GNU General Public
License (i suppose you are using GPLv3
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt for the kernel KFreeBSD) and
is easy to undestand why:

FreeBSD license   (#FreeBSD)

This is the original BSD license with the advertising clause and
another clause removed. (It is also sometimes called the “2-clause BSD
license”.) It is a simple, permissive non-copyleft free software
license, compatible with the GNU GPL.

If you want a simple, permissive non-copyleft free software license,
the FreeBSD license is a reasonable choice. However, please don't call
it a “BSD” or “BSD-style” license, because that is likely to cause
confusion which could lead to use of the flawed original BSD license.

(Continue reading)

Paolo Del Bene | 9 Apr 2012 00:47
Picon

is zfs incompatible with the GNU Project ?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Edward Tomasz Napierała <trasz <at> freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 13:26:18 +0100
Subject: Re: Bug#651624: is zfs incompatible with the GNU Project ?
To: Paolo Delbene <id3rfix <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Egger <christoph <at> debian.org>, 651624 <at> bugs.debian.org,
Robert Millan <rmh <at> debian.org>, debian-bsd <at> lists.debian.org

On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 09:09:24PM +0100, Paolo Delbene wrote:
>  Paolo Delbene
> <id3rfix <at> gmail.com> 	07 febbraio 2012 02:47
> A: debian-bsd <debian-bsd <at> lists.debian.org>
>
> Hi,
>
> For that i know the GNU Project is based on the GNU General Public
> License (i suppose you are using GPLv3
> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt for the kernel KFreeBSD) and
> is easy to undestand why:
>
> FreeBSD license   (#FreeBSD)
>
> This is the original BSD license with the advertising clause and
> another clause removed. (It is also sometimes called the “2-clause BSD
> license”.) It is a simple, permissive non-copyleft free software
> license, compatible with the GNU GPL.
>
> If you want a simple, permissive non-copyleft free software license,
> the FreeBSD license is a reasonable choice. However, please don't call
> it a “BSD” or “BSD-style” license, because that is likely to cause
(Continue reading)

Armijn Hemel | 9 Apr 2012 06:56

Re: is zfs incompatible with the GNU Project ?

Paulo,

stop doing this.

armijn

--

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
      armijn <at> gpl-violations.org || http://www.gpl-violations.org/
------------------------------------------------------------------------


Gmane