DDPOMail robot | 30 Jun 2012 22:57
Picon
Favicon

Possible problems in your Debian packages

This is an automated mail. These mails are sent at most twice a month.
For more information about these mails, refer to
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail

=== beast:
= 2 Release Critical bug(s):
- #674900 <http://bugs.debian.org/674900>
  beast fails to build from source ( ../doxer/doxer.py: No such file or directory)
- #672030 <http://bugs.debian.org/672030>
  beast: FTBFS: birnetutils.cc:725:44: error: 'access' was not declared in this scope

=== csound:
= 1 Release Goals bug(s):
- #414330 <http://bugs.debian.org/414330>
  csound: FTBFS on GNU/kFreeBSD: missing OS detection
  Part of release goal: kfreebsd-* as release architectures

=== dmedia:
= Not in testing for 206 days.
  See <http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=dmedia>

=== flumotion:
= 1 Release Critical bug(s):
- #679318 <http://bugs.debian.org/679318>
  flumotion: twisted override bug - one more

=== mediatomb:
= 2 Release Critical bug(s):
- #677959 <http://bugs.debian.org/677959>
  mediatomb: fails to build against current version of libavformat
(Continue reading)

Adrian Knoth | 2 Jul 2012 12:18
Picon
Gravatar

Re: Possible problems in your Debian packages

On 06/30/2012 10:57 PM, DDPOMail robot wrote:

Hi!

Just a little QA for the QA. ;)

> === Packages with a new upstream version available:
>   faustworks  0.3.2  (Debian: 0.3.2~repack0-1)
>   mda-lv2  1.0.0  (Debian: 1.0.0~dfsg0-1)
>   mididings  0~20120419  (Debian: 0~20120419~ds0-1)
>   sooperlooper  1.6.18  (Debian: 1.6.18~dfsg0-1)

Here, the dfsg repackaging seems to confuse the script.

>   lv2file  /upstream/0.82  (Debian: 0.83-1)

Weird situation, upstream probably forgot to update its version
information. Anyway, a false positive nevertheless..

Cheers

Gmane