1 Jun 2005 06:19
Re: Is Ubuntu a debian derivative or is it a fork?
mag <mag <at> debian.org>
2005-06-01 04:19:03 GMT
2005-06-01 04:19:03 GMT
2005-05-31, k keltezéssel 21.00-kor John Goerzen ezt írta: > > Other taxonomist may also argue that Debian is an infrastructural > > distribution, which is well suited to be the base of such "spoons". > > Perhaps, but there are some issues with that. > > In the ubuntu case in particular, I wish that they would be more > proactive in sending their patches to the Debian maintainers. > Sometimes they are changing things for some unique "ubuntu way". Okay, these were the problems. And here is a good part of the solution: > Finally, I would like to see many more developers putting their > packages a distributed version control system like Arch or, better > yet, Darcs. If everyone in the food chain, at least down from the debian maintainer, would use that, it would greatly simplify problems with patch management. Just I highly doubt it is doable. It could also help to apply upper stream patches for spoons while sticking to their spoonerisms ;), and even not giving them back in patches again and again. I guess that we, as Debian developers have no ground to criticise downstream for doing things in their own way, provided they don't keep pushing things deemed unacceptable.(Continue reading)
RSS Feed