Can someone make a reasonable approximation to an official comment on the timeline for KDE 4.x getting beyond experimental, and traversing unstable/testing/stable? Thanks. Gord
On 2008-11-07, Gordon Haverland <ghaverla <at> materialisations.com> wrote: > Can someone make a reasonable approximation to an official comment > on the timeline for KDE 4.x getting beyond experimental, and > traversing unstable/testing/stable? unstable: within a week after lenny release testing: probably a month later stable: at squeeze release /Sune - who currently have the highest odds of being the one to upload kde4 to unstable
* Sune Vuorela [Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:17:40 +0000]:
> On 2008-11-07, Gordon Haverland <ghaverla <at> materialisations.com> wrote:
> > Can someone make a reasonable approximation to an official comment
> > on the timeline for KDE 4.x getting beyond experimental, and
> > traversing unstable/testing/stable?
> unstable: within a week after lenny release
Hopefully it's possible to coordinate with the release team on this. In
principle I don't there there'll be any problems, since it's a pretty
much self-contained set of packages and the new libraries come from a
different source package, but well, I'm guessing you'd like for it to
migrate all at once, so coordination would be nice.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore,
if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not
smart enough to debug it.
-- Brian W. Kernighan
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-REQUEST <at> lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster <at> lists.debian.org
(Continue reading)On 2008-11-08, Adeodato Sim?? <dato <at> net.com.org.es> wrote: > * Sune Vuorela [Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:17:40 +0000]: > >> On 2008-11-07, Gordon Haverland <ghaverla <at> materialisations.com> wrote: >> > Can someone make a reasonable approximation to an official comment >> > on the timeline for KDE 4.x getting beyond experimental, and >> > traversing unstable/testing/stable? > >> unstable: within a week after lenny release > > Hopefully it's possible to coordinate with the release team on this. In Of course. But with the big backlog of mails needing processing in -release, I thought I would wait a bit with taking release team time for coordination. If release team members feel like discussing it now, I'm open for that. /Sune
* Sune Vuorela [Sat, 08 Nov 2008 10:49:23 +0000]: > On 2008-11-08, Adeodato Sim?? <dato <at> net.com.org.es> wrote: > > * Sune Vuorela [Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:17:40 +0000]: > >> On 2008-11-07, Gordon Haverland <ghaverla <at> materialisations.com> wrote: > >> > Can someone make a reasonable approximation to an official comment > >> > on the timeline for KDE 4.x getting beyond experimental, and > >> > traversing unstable/testing/stable? > >> unstable: within a week after lenny release > > Hopefully it's possible to coordinate with the release team on this. In > Of course. Great. > But with the big backlog of mails needing processing in -release, I > thought I would wait a bit with taking release team time for > coordination. > If release team members feel like discussing it now, I'm open for that. Oh no, of course coordinating with the release team /after/ the release of Lenny. Thanks, -- --(Continue reading)
On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 09:17:40PM +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2008-11-07, Gordon Haverland <ghaverla <at> materialisations.com> wrote: > > Can someone make a reasonable approximation to an official comment > > on the timeline for KDE 4.x getting beyond experimental, and > > traversing unstable/testing/stable? > > unstable: within a week after lenny release > testing: probably a month later Not 10 days? > stable: at squeeze release Of course!, (maybe backports?) although maybe KDE 6.x :) > /Sune > - who currently have the highest odds of being the one to upload kde4 > to unstable -- -- Chris. ====== I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours. -- Stephen F Roberts
Chris Bannister wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 09:17:40PM +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote: >> On 2008-11-07, Gordon Haverland <ghaverla <at> materialisations.com> wrote: >>> Can someone make a reasonable approximation to an official comment >>> on the timeline for KDE 4.x getting beyond experimental, and >>> traversing unstable/testing/stable? >> unstable: within a week after lenny release >> testing: probably a month later > > Not 10 days? Do you really think it won't have RC bugs? :P :P -- -- Bernd Zeimetz Debian GNU/Linux Developer GPG Fingerprint: 06C8 C9A2 EAAD E37E 5B2C BE93 067A AD04 C93B FF79
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:54:23PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Chris Bannister wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 09:17:40PM +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote: > >> On 2008-11-07, Gordon Haverland <ghaverla <at> materialisations.com> wrote: > >>> Can someone make a reasonable approximation to an official comment > >>> on the timeline for KDE 4.x getting beyond experimental, and > >>> traversing unstable/testing/stable? > >> unstable: within a week after lenny release > >> testing: probably a month later > > > > Not 10 days? > > Do you really think it won't have RC bugs? :P :P Sorry, I was misunderstanding "packages migrate in 10 days" and "testing". Probably thinking packages migrate in 10 days for testing unless a newer version appears in unstable in that time, where that new version would migrate in 10 days instead etc. I see now there is more tighter control and "testing" is a wee bit of a misnomer. -- -- Chris. ====== I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours. -- Stephen F Roberts(Continue reading)
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 02:48:24AM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: >On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:54:23PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: >> Chris Bannister wrote: >> > On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 09:17:40PM +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote: >> >> On 2008-11-07, Gordon Haverland <ghaverla <at> materialisations.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>> Can someone make a reasonable approximation to an official >> >>> comment on the timeline for KDE 4.x getting beyond experimental, >> >>> and traversing unstable/testing/stable? >> >> unstable: within a week after lenny release testing: probably a >> >> month later >> > >> > Not 10 days? >> >> Do you really think it won't have RC bugs? :P :P > >Sorry, I was misunderstanding "packages migrate in 10 days" and >"testing". Probably thinking packages migrate in 10 days for testing >unless a newer version appears in unstable in that time, where that new >version would migrate in 10 days instead etc. > >I see now there is more tighter control and "testing" is a wee bit of a >misnomer. The label "testing" does not refer to the testing of each package (this should ideally be done _before_ upload to Debian!), but to the whole _pool_ of packages and their relationships: The testing of next release of the distribution.(Continue reading)
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Can someone make a reasonable approximation to an official comment > on the timeline for KDE 4.x getting beyond experimental, and > traversing unstable/testing/stable? > Ask on debian-kde... if no one already did.
I had been looking in many places for information on this, and it seemed writing Debian-Project was the best. Thank you for the answer. Gord
RSS Feed