1 Dec 2003 11:40
Re: Demudi.org
Tom <tb.31123.nospam <at> comcast.net>
2003-12-01 10:40:37 GMT
2003-12-01 10:40:37 GMT
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 11:28:43AM +0100, Benj. Mako Hill wrote: > On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 01:02:06AM -0800, Joshua Kwan wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 11:31:53PM -0800, Tom wrote: > > > One of the "flavors" linked to on > > > http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-nonprofit/ is www.demudi.org -- > > > > > > which is running IIS on Windows 2000! > > > > If you'd gone to the site it would be evident that its host is having > > some problems anyway. I don't think it would appear to be running that > > if everything were working smoothly. > I said you'd grandstand(Continue reading)> Indeed. > > The more useful suggestion would be to remove the the link from the > page because the page is producing a nasty error message and not a > useful page -- not because we recognize the error message as coming > from a webserver we don't like. > > I'm planning an update of the page in question with information about > the new Debian-NP bootable CD and some other news and updates which > I'll do as soon as CVS access returns. If the DeMuDi site is indeed > down for the count, we can remove the link with the next update. > > In any case, this suggestion would have been better directed to > debian-www rather than to -devel. >
> Indeed.
>
> The more useful suggestion would be to remove the the link from the
> page because the page is producing a nasty error message and not a
> useful page -- not because we recognize the error message as coming
> from a webserver we don't like.
>
> I'm planning an update of the page in question with information about
> the new Debian-NP bootable CD and some other news and updates which
> I'll do as soon as CVS access returns. If the DeMuDi site is indeed
> down for the count, we can remove the link with the next update.
>
> In any case, this suggestion would have been better directed to
> debian-www rather than to -devel.
>
RSS Feed