Hi! I'm using Debian Wheezy, updated, on AMD64, with Gnome 3.4, flashplugin-nonfree 2.8.3. Flash plugin is working in Iceweasel and Midori but not under Epiphany. I've followed the steps here[1] but with no success. Could you please point me to a solution to this issue? [1] http://ask.debian.net/questions/epiphany-and-flashplayer Razvan
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:50:10 +0300, Razvan Deaconescu wrote: > I'm using Debian Wheezy, updated, on AMD64, with Gnome 3.4, > flashplugin-nonfree 2.8.3. Flash plugin is working in Iceweasel and > Midori but not under Epiphany. > > I've followed the steps here[1] but with no success. > > Could you please point me to a solution to this issue? First, ensure the "about:plugins" lists the Adobe Flash plugin. Then run this command an send here the output: update-alternatives --display flash-mozilla.so > [1] http://ask.debian.net/questions/epiphany-and-flashplayer Wait... the above links seems to point that the newer Epiphany is based in GTK3 and thus cannot work with Adobe Flash Player which is GTK2 based so it needs "nspluginwrapper". I wonder if this really the problem here :-? Greetings, -- Camaleón -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST <at> lists.debian.org(Continue reading)
Camaleón <noelamac <at> gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 09:50:10 +0300, Razvan Deaconescu wrote: > >> I'm using Debian Wheezy, updated, on AMD64, with Gnome 3.4, >> flashplugin-nonfree 2.8.3. Flash plugin is working in Iceweasel and >> Midori but not under Epiphany. >> >> I've followed the steps here[1] but with no success. >> >> Could you please point me to a solution to this issue? > > First, ensure the "about:plugins" lists the Adobe Flash plugin. It is listed. It prints the same value as Iceweasel. > Then run this command an send here the output: > > update-alternatives --display flash-mozilla.so $ update-alternatives --display flash-mozilla.so flash-mozilla.so - auto mode link currently points to /usr/lib/flashplayer-mozilla/libflashplayer.so /usr/lib/flashplayer-mozilla/libflashplayer.so - priority 10 Current 'best' version is '/usr/lib/flashplayer-mozilla/libflashplayer.so' >> [1] http://ask.debian.net/questions/epiphany-and-flashplayer > > Wait... the above links seems to point that the newer Epiphany is based > in GTK3 and thus cannot work with Adobe Flash Player which is GTK2 based(Continue reading)
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:55:46 +0300, Razvan Deaconescu wrote: > Camaleón <noelamac <at> gmail.com> writes: >> Wait... the above links seems to point that the newer Epiphany is based >> in GTK3 and thus cannot work with Adobe Flash Player which is GTK2 >> based so it needs "nspluginwrapper". I wonder if this really the >> problem here :-? > > Hmmm ... I've found this post[1]. So finally it seems the above holds true, how bad(Continue reading)> It signals the same issue I'm having. I guess I would have to install > the 32 bit version of libflashplayer.so; it looks weird to have a > functional 64 bit version for Iceweasel/Midori but a nspluginwrapper > -endorsed 32 bit version for Epiphany. Yup... and the worst thing is that "nspluginwrapper" used to be quite problematic (leading to browser freeze) or at least that's what I recall when we had to use it because no native flash player plugin was available for 64 bits. I wonder if Adobe is going to do something right any time. What a deficient company, gosh... > [1] http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=77934 Greetings,
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 13:11 +0000, Camaleón wrote: > deficient company deficient + company = unfortunately a tautology nowadays There's no reason for even market economy to be evil. Of course, there's a small border between social market and "vanilla market economy".
On Sun, 17 Jun 2012 15:24:05 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 13:11 +0000, Camaleón wrote: >> deficient company > > deficient + company = unfortunately a tautology nowadays There's no > reason for even market economy to be evil. Of course, there's a small > border between social market and "vanilla market economy". The problem is that Adobe does nothing well while other companies _do_ and this remains true not only for their linux apps but also for their windows product line so this is not a casualty, something fails within Adobe. P.S. Ralf, I like to see deviations from the main subject but consider in tagging your replies as such. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST <at> lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster <at> lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/jrkmdc$f0n$11 <at> dough.gmane.org
On Sun, 2012-06-17 at 13:34 +0000, Camaleón wrote: > P.S. Ralf, I like to see deviations from the main subject but consider in > tagging your replies as such. Apologize for not adding OT to the subject.
RSS Feed