Markus Rechberger | 21 May 2007 00:39
Picon

Re: Kworld 380u ?

Hi guys,

David, did you alter the card struct in order to get your device work,
this Usb ID hasn't been added to the card struct yet?

François, Vinz, can someone open the device and look what ICs are used
on that board? I think it's a qt1010 and em28xx, since David wrote
that he used the qt1010 driver I guess it doesn't need a firmware, but
I don't know what chips are on that board either.

Markus

On 5/20/07, François Fontaine <fontaine.francois <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does Kworld 380u work with Linux ? I tried to install it with firmware V1
> (the same as Kworld 350) and when i go to Kaffeine player, my key is not
> recognized.
> Thanks for your help
>
> (Excuse my English, i'm french)
>

--

-- 
Markus Rechberger
Susan Edwards | 21 May 2007 08:32
Picon
Favicon

Re: [linux-dvb] Kworld 380u ?

Dear Markus

I recall that the Vendor ID and PID for my device were already there, 
and it was the only entry that said it was a 355U. At that stage I 
didn't consider the other possibilities.

According to the KWorld Windows INF file, all the following have an 
EM2870 and a QT1010.

I can infer from KWorld Windows Registry settings that they must have 
used different revisions of the QT1010 in different devices. The 
differences must be significant to the Windows driver (otherwise, why 
bother to note them in the registry).

I assume, from the correspondence between 355U and the Product ID, that

   eb1a:e355

was the original EM2870 + QT1010.

I think this is Julian Cable's device, and it doesn't work; leastways, I 
have heard nothing since 7th May.

I assumed that it must also have a Zarlink 10353, but I have no 
documentary evidence for this.

I think the Vendor and Product ID's below all correspond to some flavour 
or other of the KWorld 380U.

Vendor ID:Product ID eb1a:e357 is 'Disable LNA' (this is my device, 380U 
(Continue reading)

Markus Rechberger | 21 May 2007 09:45
Picon

Re: [linux-dvb] Kworld 380u ?

On 5/21/07, Susan Edwards <se014a0001 <at> blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> Dear Markus
>
> I recall that the Vendor ID and PID for my device were already there,
> and it was the only entry that said it was a 355U. At that stage I
> didn't consider the other possibilities.
>
> According to the KWorld Windows INF file, all the following have an
> EM2870 and a QT1010.
>
> I can infer from KWorld Windows Registry settings that they must have
> used different revisions of the QT1010 in different devices. The
> differences must be significant to the Windows driver (otherwise, why
> bother to note them in the registry).
>
> I assume, from the correspondence between 355U and the Product ID, that
>
>    eb1a:e355
>
> was the original EM2870 + QT1010.
>
> I think this is Julian Cable's device, and it doesn't work; leastways, I
> have heard nothing since 7th May.
>
> I assumed that it must also have a Zarlink 10353, but I have no
> documentary evidence for this.
>
> I think the Vendor and Product ID's below all correspond to some flavour
> or other of the KWorld 380U.
>
(Continue reading)


Gmane