3 Dec 1999 20:28
power down
Bob Canup <rcanup <at> go2fax.com>
1999-12-03 19:28:42 GMT
1999-12-03 19:28:42 GMT
The reason that I said that expecting anything to work during power down is wishful thinking is this: once the voltage to a digital chip goes below the minimum specification of the chip, the behavior of the chip becomes indeterminate. For example: the old Western Digital 1791 double density disk controller chip would sometimes glitch in such a way during power down that it would write to the floppy - you could see the floppy light blink when this happened. Unless chips are specifically designed to handle power down conditions this sort of thing happens. For example - any competently designed Flash memory has to refuse to write if the voltage is below spec. As to flushing the buffers and doing a shutdown when a power fail condition occurs - I believe that Linux already has code to handle a power down such as I described. What I have described is very similar to a UPS signaling the kernel that power is going down. Linux can do an ordered shutdown when it receives the signal. Qualifying digital circuitry with a POWER GOOD signal is very similar to protecting the circuitry with a typical 'SCR over voltage crowbar circuit': it makes the engineer feel good - but it doesn't actually do much of anything. Why doesn't the crowbar work? After all, it is a text book circuit. The answer is that the SCR is a power device which takes on the order of 10 microseconds to turn on while the delicate chips are destroyed by a few nanoseconds of over voltage. The result is that the SCR never turns on - the fuse blows because the weakest digital chip shorts the power supply(Continue reading)
RSS Feed