Greg Folkert | 6 May 23:05

So, how about those 46 Patent Court Judges...

I guess, I have to ask if anyone thinks this is a problem.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/06/washington/06bar.html

From the article, the main thrust of the discovery:

        His (John F. Duffy's) basic point does not appear to be in
        dispute. Since 2000, patent judges have been appointed by a
        government official without the constitutional power to do so.

I don't consider myself qualified enough, but from my perspective, this
could be a nice big quagmire, in addition to the backlog already there
in the patent courts.

Could this also have an effect on the Patents that have been over
turned? Like for Blackboard and others that are doing predatory suits.

I know Blackboard had (many of its) patents overturned for validity, but
could they have another stab at getting them re-instated? Easily?

Any comments from the Device Drivers guys on the NDA and other patent
issues for those things written for the Linux Kernel?

Does this affect the BSD camps or any Apache's projects? (thinking
outside the box here) What about Open Solaris or things like Microsoft's
Patent Promise (or whatever its called... bleah)

Do we have a dreadful next couple of years dealing with patent issues?
Or is this an opportunity for the US-ian Federal Government to make a
good legislative decision? Once can only hope the US-GOV makes the right
(Continue reading)

Greg KH | 6 May 23:13

Re: So, how about those 46 Patent Court Judges...

On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 05:05:42PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> 
> Any comments from the Device Drivers guys on the NDA and other patent
> issues for those things written for the Linux Kernel?

There are no known patent issues with anything to do with the Linux
kernel that I am aware of.  I do not think this problem will have any
impact on anything regarding the kernel at all.

thanks,

greg k-h
Greg Folkert | 7 May 02:01

Re: So, how about those 46 Patent Court Judges...


On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 14:13 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 05:05:42PM -0400, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > 
> > Any comments from the Device Drivers guys on the NDA and other patent
> > issues for those things written for the Linux Kernel?
> 
> There are no known patent issues with anything to do with the Linux
> kernel that I am aware of.  I do not think this problem will have any
> impact on anything regarding the kernel at all.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

PRAISE $DEITY! for that! I wasn't insinuating anything. Just trying to
make sure nuffink was over-looked or ignored. Its not like I hate Linux,
as I use it everyday all the time for everything I do with a computer or
processor. Of course Barring my Palm Treo 750p phone.

BTW, if nobody has said it recently:

        Thanks Greg, for your hard work on "that thing you do" for we,
        users. In fact, please say thanks to everyone doing "that thing
        they do" for the Linux Kernel.

Seriously, I'd be forced to use that other set of OS'. Not that its
bad... just well different.
--

-- 
greg <at> gregfolkert.net
(Continue reading)


Gmane