Re: Last rites for net-ftp/netkit-tftp
Pacho Ramos <pacho <at> gentoo.org>
2012-07-09 20:34:34 GMT
El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 21:06 -0400, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
> On 07/08/2012 08:57 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> > On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:29:35 +0200
> > Pacho Ramos<pacho <at> gentoo.org> wrote:
> >> El dom, 08-07-2012 a las 21:49 +0200, Diego Elio Pettenò escribió:
> >>> Il 08/07/2012 20:13, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn ha scritto:
> >>>> Please report a removal bug for this, so any issues concerning
> >>>> users of netkit-tftp can be tracked.
> >>> Here it is:
> >>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=425362
> >>> And actually Robin K. who submitted the overflow bug I fixed,
> >>> pointed out that there _are_ cases where hpa doesn't work but
> >>> netkit does, so I've downgraded the removal to a simple masking for
> >>> bad code.
> >>> I guess we'll wait a bit more before removing this, in the mean time
> >>> though I don't really feel happy with leaving it unmasked so it'll
> >>> stay as it is.
> >> If its upstream is completely dead, it has bad code and it has a
> >> replacement, I would still go to treeclean it
> > But if it provides the only means to netboot certain hardware, then you
> > might think twice.
> > jer
> I have several ubiquity routerstations (the hardware in questions) and