李易 | 20 Jun 2012 05:40
Picon

How does SACK or FACK determine the time to start fast retransmition ?

HI all,
	When tcp uses reno as its congestion control algothim, it uses
tp->sacked_out as dup-ack. When the third dup-ack(under default
condition) comes, tcp will initiate its fast retransmition.
	But how about sack ?
	According to kernel source code comments, when sack or fack tcp option
is enabled, there is no dup-ack counter. See comments for function
tcp_dupack_heuristics():
http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.37/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c#L2300

	So , how does tcp know the current dup-ack is the last one which
triggers the fast retransmition?
	
	According to rfc3517 section 5:
	"Upon the receipt of the first (DupThresh - 1) duplicate ACKs, the
scoreboard is to be updated as normal."
	"When a TCP sender receives the duplicate ACK corresponding to
DupThresh ACKs, the scoreboard MUST be updated with the new SACK
information (via Update ()). If no previous loss event has occurred
on the connection or the cumulative acknowledgment point is beyond
the last value of RecoveryPoint, a loss recovery phase SHOULD be
initiated, per the fast retransmit algorithm outlined in [RFC2581]."
	
	But these sentences doesn't describe how tcp knows the current ack is
the dup-threshold dup-ack.
	

	Accorrding to rfc3517 seciton 4 and isLost(Seqnum) function:
	"The routine returns true when either
DupThresh discontiguous SACKed sequences have arrived above
(Continue reading)


Gmane