David Farning | 19 Aug 04:42
Favicon

[sugar] Release cycle - Goals

Over the last weeks I have been looking at how we can improve our
release cycle. Today will be about defining and implementing goals.

Setting goals for any software project is hard, much less an open source
project.

Marco started the discussion last week at
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/sugar/2008-August/007838.html .  He
has also started a wiki page at
http://sugarlabs.org/go/ReleaseTeam/Roadmap/0.84 .

There seem to be as many methods for setting goals as there are
projects.  There is not a best practice.

Some of the variables are:
1.  Size of the project.  Larger project such as eclipse have developed
very formal methods.  Smaller project tend to be more informal.

2. Collaboration vs. Competition.  Projects differ in the attitudes with
which stakeholders regard each other.

3. Commercial vs. Commons.  Project differ with regards to their
interest in commercializing their product. 

4.  Dictator vs. Membership.  Some project such as the kernel do well
with the BD others such as Debian are entirely membership driven.

5. Planned vs. Evolutionary.

1.  Sugar Labs in in the category of small to medium sized.  We have
(Continue reading)

Tomeu Vizoso | 19 Aug 10:20

[sugar] Release cycle - Goals

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 4:42 AM, David Farning <dfarning at sugarlabs.org> wrote:
>
> Proposal:
>
> 1. Continue the discussion that Marco started on sugar at laptop.org .
> 2. Submit suggestions for future development via
> http://sugarlabs.org/go/ReleaseTeam/Roadmap/0.84 .

Agreed, I want to start contributing to it as soon as feel a bit more
free from 8.2.0.

Regards,

Tomeu

Marco Pesenti Gritti | 31 Aug 01:52

[sugar] Release cycle - Goals

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 4:42 AM, David Farning <dfarning at sugarlabs.org> wrote:
> Proposal:
>
> 1. Continue the discussion that Marco started on sugar at laptop.org .
> 2. Submit suggestions for future development via
> http://sugarlabs.org/go/ReleaseTeam/Roadmap/0.84 .
> 3. Appoint Marco and Greg Smith to assign priorities to the list of
> suggestions.
> 4.  Individuals volunteer to work on features.

Sounds like a good plan. We are still at the brainstorming phase
there, I hope the plans will solidify in the next 2-3 weeks.

Marco


Gmane