Re: [Bug 1606] Broken path of nALFS executible in runit.sh script]

Quoting Joachim Beckers <jbeckers <at> linuxfromscratch.org>:
> Matt Lloyd wrote:
> > i belive the BLFS runit.sh has an 'if' statment that deals with this
> > problem
> > 
> > ---BLFS/runin.sh---- if [ -e /usr/bin/nALFS ]; then
> >    /usr/bin/nALFS -S -l -L nalfs.log BLFS.xml
> > else
> >    /usr/local/bin/nALFS -S -l -L nalfs.log BLFS.xml
> > fi-------
> 
> Yep, I added this once.
> 
> > why not do the same? and just alter the params to suite
> 
> I think just replacing the /usr/*/bin/nALFS with nALFS is the way to go
> (possibly with a check to see if nALFS is in the path). It shouldn't
> give any trouble.

Agreed. Just nALFS should be used by both BLFS and LFS.

> Joachim

-- Jamie
--

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/alfs-discuss
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page