Re: Review Swaps for sugar activities

Excerpts from Jason L Tibbitts III's message of Mon Jul 02 07:38:40 +1000 2012:
> >>>>> "DC" == Dan Callaghan <dcallagh <at> redhat.com> writes:
> 
> DC> I will take all three (they look straightforward  in exchange for
> DC> saslwrapper:
> 
> Since you appear to be familiar with sugar, is there any possibility
> that you (or anyone else who is familiar with sugar stuff) could cast a
> glance at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708663 ?  This
> poor guy has been waiting for nearly 13 months for someone to look at
> his package.  I can do the bulk of the review and the sponsorship if no
> sponsor/sugar expert is available but I don't know how to actually do
> any testing of sugar-related things.

I am by no means a Sugar expert. I didn't know anything about it until 
I took these three reviews last night.  I am working from the Sugar 
activity guidelines here:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SugarActivityGuidelines

and I installed F17 in a VM and did

yum groupinstall Sugar\ Desktop\ Environment

for testing out the packages. It also helps that the activities are in 
Python which I am well versed in.

As it happens I was planning to try and track down somebody responsible 
for those guidelines, because there are a few things which do not seem 
right to me. I've found the OLPC list (cc'ed) which seems to be the