Karsten 'quaid' Wade | 26 Sep 03:08
Favicon

structure for F10 final release notes

If you look at the beats, think of them as topic-specific buckets of
content:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats

Once converted to XML, we can reorder them at-will to get different
structures.  We've discussed doing a radical overhaul in the past, but
have instead done a set of slow, steady evolutions. *yawn*

Here is a strawman proposal, meaning a thin structure to throw more
ideas against:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_notes_structure_for_F10

Trying to cover the usual use cases, give it a tone people might relate
to, push up front some issues people care about (installer, bugs,
hardware support, etc.)  I believe this structure covers all the Beat
content.  To quote:

     1. What's new in Fedora 10 -- Overview
     2. What is new for installation and live images -- important
        installer notes, live image instruction sets, pointers to more
        docs
     3. What's the latest on the desktop -- *all* GUI applications,
        l10n, a11y 
             1. How has software installing and updating improved --
                Add/Remove Software
             2. Do you browse the web, read email, and create/edit
                office documents?
             3. What is to celebrate for musicians, artists, and other
(Continue reading)

Jason | 29 Sep 14:04

Re: structure for F10 final release notes

On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 18:11 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> If you look at the beats, think of them as topic-specific buckets of
> content:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats
> 
> Once converted to XML, we can reorder them at-will to get different
> structures.  We've discussed doing a radical overhaul in the past, but
> have instead done a set of slow, steady evolutions. *yawn*
> 
> Here is a strawman proposal, meaning a thin structure to throw more
> ideas against:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_notes_structure_for_F10
> 
> Trying to cover the usual use cases, give it a tone people might relate
> to, push up front some issues people care about (installer, bugs,
> hardware support, etc.)  I believe this structure covers all the Beat
> content.  To quote:
> 
>      1. What's new in Fedora 10 -- Overview
>      2. What is new for installation and live images -- important
>         installer notes, live image instruction sets, pointers to more
>         docs
>      3. What's the latest on the desktop -- *all* GUI applications,
>         l10n, a11y 
>              1. How has software installing and updating improved --
>                 Add/Remove Software
>              2. Do you browse the web, read email, and create/edit
>                 office documents?
(Continue reading)

Paul W. Frields | 29 Sep 15:09
Gravatar

Re: structure for F10 final release notes

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 08:04:52AM -0400, Jason wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 18:11 -0700, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
> > If you look at the beats, think of them as topic-specific buckets of
> > content:
> > 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Beats
> > 
> > Once converted to XML, we can reorder them at-will to get different
> > structures.  We've discussed doing a radical overhaul in the past, but
> > have instead done a set of slow, steady evolutions. *yawn*
> > 
> > Here is a strawman proposal, meaning a thin structure to throw more
> > ideas against:
> > 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_notes_structure_for_F10
> > 
> > Trying to cover the usual use cases, give it a tone people might relate
> > to, push up front some issues people care about (installer, bugs,
> > hardware support, etc.)  I believe this structure covers all the Beat
> > content.  To quote:
> > 
> >      1. What's new in Fedora 10 -- Overview
> >      2. What is new for installation and live images -- important
> >         installer notes, live image instruction sets, pointers to more
> >         docs
> >      3. What's the latest on the desktop -- *all* GUI applications,
> >         l10n, a11y 
> >              1. How has software installing and updating improved --
> >                 Add/Remove Software
> >              2. Do you browse the web, read email, and create/edit
(Continue reading)

Karsten 'quaid' Wade | 29 Sep 19:03
Favicon

Re: structure for F10 final release notes


On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 08:04 -0400, Jason wrote:

> I think this has the sort of grouping/flow most readers like. I would
> like to see us at least try it, see what feedback we get and then
> decide
> yea or nay?

In fact, this is one of the many reasons for having a 'beta' document
ready by F10 Preview Release.  Since it is all translated XML files, we
should be able to tweak the structure from Preview Release responses
without creating a bunch of work for the translators.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, Community Gardener
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
--

-- 
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list <at> redhat.com
To unsubscribe: 
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
John J. McDonough | 29 Sep 15:27

Re: structure for F10 final release notes


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Karsten 'quaid' Wade" <kwade <at> redhat.com>
To: "Fedora Documentation Project" <fedora-docs-list <at> redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 9:11 PM
Subject: structure for F10 final release notes

[clip]
>              3. What is to celebrate for musicians, artists, and other
>                 creative types?
>              4. What is the new stuff for gamers, scientists, and
>                 hobbyists?

This is an interesting breakdown.  I suspect that when technical people 
think of hobbyists, technical hobbies come to mind, so the grouping with 
scientists might make sense.  That does, however, leave out non-technical 
hobbyists.  I have to admit, not being a stamp collector or a quilter, I 
don't really know that there is anything for non-tech hobbyists, but I 
suspect there is.  Including the gamers totally confuses me though.  I would 
think they have more in common with the "creative" types.

I'm not sure I can propose a better breakdown, though.  It does seem like 
there is a big difference between creative and entertainment ... i.e., a 
music player has a very different audience than a music composition app. 
The former has more in common with the gamer, in fact, in terms of 
"entertainment", while the latter is probably closer to, say, an electronic 
design suite, actually "creating" something rather than using it.  Of 
course, intuitively, they are pretty far apart.

Perhaps
(Continue reading)

Karsten 'quaid' Wade | 29 Sep 19:06
Favicon

Re: structure for F10 final release notes


On Mon, 2008-09-29 at 09:27 -0400, John J. McDonough wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Karsten 'quaid' Wade" <kwade <at> redhat.com>
> To: "Fedora Documentation Project" <fedora-docs-list <at> redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 9:11 PM
> Subject: structure for F10 final release notes
> 
> [clip]
> >              3. What is to celebrate for musicians, artists, and other
> >                 creative types?
> >              4. What is the new stuff for gamers, scientists, and
> >                 hobbyists?
> 
> This is an interesting breakdown.  I suspect that when technical people 
> think of hobbyists, technical hobbies come to mind, so the grouping with 
> scientists might make sense.  That does, however, leave out non-technical 
> hobbyists.  I have to admit, not being a stamp collector or a quilter, I 
> don't really know that there is anything for non-tech hobbyists, but I 
> suspect there is.  Including the gamers totally confuses me though.  I would 
> think they have more in common with the "creative" types.

Good point, I was using the common to Linux narrow hobbyist definition,
that is, people who play with Linux for personal rather than
professional reasons.  There is also some crossover with power users.

> I'm not sure I can propose a better breakdown, though.  It does seem like 
> there is a big difference between creative and entertainment ... i.e., a 
> music player has a very different audience than a music composition app. 
> The former has more in common with the gamer, in fact, in terms of 
(Continue reading)


Gmane