It seems it only checks posix stuffs and doesn't even setuid... IMHO RSBAC without a working NFS implementation is almost a showstopper. What alternatives are there? smb mounts are only for single users AFAIK -- -- Lorenzo Marcantonio Logos Srl
On 13/07/12 09:32, Lorenzo Marcantonio wrote: > It seems it only checks posix stuffs and doesn't even setuid... > > IMHO RSBAC without a working NFS implementation is almost a showstopper. > > What alternatives are there? smb mounts are only for single users AFAIK > CODA?
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 09:54:26AM +0200, Javier Juan Martínez Cabezón wrote: > CODA? Is that *thing* still alive? Also it completely *own* the stuff, permission included (like AFS it implements a fs-on-fs) -- -- Lorenzo Marcantonio Logos Srl _______________________________________________ rsbac mailing list rsbac <at> rsbac.org http://www.rsbac.org/mailman/listinfo/rsbac
On Friday 13 July 2012 wrote Lorenzo Marcantonio: > It seems it only checks posix stuffs and doesn't even setuid... > > IMHO RSBAC without a working NFS implementation is almost a showstopper. > > What alternatives are there? smb mounts are only for single users AFAIK For security reasons, I strongly recommend a user space solution, no matter what protocol - nfsd, samba, glusterfsd, ceph daemons, ... Amon. -- -- http://www.rsbac.org - GnuPG: 2048g/5DEAAA30 2002-10-22
RSS Feed