8 Aug 03:44
Re: git and 2.6.26.2 (fwd)
From: Kenneth Crudup <kenny <at> panix.com>
Subject: Re: git and 2.6.26.2 (fwd)
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.swsusp.devel
Date: 2008-08-08 01:46:35 GMT
Subject: Re: git and 2.6.26.2 (fwd)
Newsgroups: gmane.linux.swsusp.devel
Date: 2008-08-08 01:46:35 GMT
The attachment is getting held up for Nigel's approval due to its size, so here it is on-line instead: http://kennethcrudup.com/private/tuxonice-2.6.26.1-patch.gz ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 18:40:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Kenneth Crudup <kenny <at> panix.com> To: tuxonice-devel <at> lists.tuxonice.net Subject: Re: [TuxOnIce-devel] git and 2.6.26.2 > I was thinking about this. Seems that if you could do a "git diff" between > Linus' 2.6.26 commit and Nigel's same commit for ToI, you could have a > baseline that you could apply to all "similar" (version.major.minor.fix) > releases. OK, I just did a git-diff between Linus' 2.6.26.1 and Nigel's equivalent commit c1259fc7cf7c172b984039213b792c08b1891c27 vs commit 83bbae617e3063a061f386ee8f96f514f9a9e1c7 if anyone wants to check my work. I've attached the gzipped result. I haven't done anything but make it; I'm about to check it myself ('cause I want a couple of fixes from 2.6.26.2 myself and not good enough with "git" to do the merge), so we'll be beta-testing it together.(Continue reading)---------- End of Forwarded message ---------- -Kenny
---------- End of Forwarded message ----------
-Kenny
RSS Feed