Toralf Förster | 10 Jul 2012 14:45
Picon
Picon

[uml-user] John Stultz' leap second check program lets an UML clock jump by few hours

I tested the script of John Stultz (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/1/203)
at a UML of an unstable Gentoo Linux with recent host
kernel linux-v3.5-rc5-98-g9e85a6f
(without his proposed patches) and observed the following time jump of
roughly 2 1/2 hours :

# /mnt/n22/home/tfoerste/a
1341446400:46860754
1341446400:46867754
...
1341446400:47172756
--------------------
1341446400:47179756
1341446399:47227757
--------------------
1341446399:283327230
...
1341446399:283555228
1341446399:283574228
1341446399:283593228
Delta: 999951999 ns

Here're the syslog lines :

Jul  4 22:22:18 n22_uml courierd: SHUTDOWN: Stopping...
Jul  5 01:59:59 n22_uml kernel: Clock: inserting leap second 23:59:60 UTC

Now I'm wondering whether it is worth to care about it or not.

--

-- 
(Continue reading)

richard -rw- weinberger | 11 Jul 2012 01:30
Picon

Re: [uml-user] John Stultz' leap second check program lets an UML clock jump by few hours

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster <at> gmx.de> wrote:
> I tested the script of John Stultz (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/1/203)
> at a UML of an unstable Gentoo Linux with recent host
> kernel linux-v3.5-rc5-98-g9e85a6f
> (without his proposed patches) and observed the following time jump of
> roughly 2 1/2 hours :

I don't know what John's programing is exactly doing.
What is the expected result?

--

-- 
Thanks,
//richard

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
Toralf Förster | 11 Jul 2012 20:16
Picon
Picon

Re: [uml-user] John Stultz' leap second check program lets an UML clock jump by few hours

On 07/11/2012 01:30 AM, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster <at> gmx.de> wrote:
>> I tested the script of John Stultz (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/1/203)
>> at a UML of an unstable Gentoo Linux with recent host
>> kernel linux-v3.5-rc5-98-g9e85a6f
>> (without his proposed patches) and observed the following time jump of
>> roughly 2 1/2 hours :
> 
> I don't know what John's programing is exactly doing.
> What is the expected result?
> 
I wouldn't expeczt more than 1 seconds time shift from the program
(attached for convenience)

--

-- 
MfG/Sincerely
Toralf Förster
pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3

Attachment (a.c): text/x-csrc, 2076 bytes
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
(Continue reading)

Toralf Förster | 11 Jul 2012 20:49
Picon
Picon

Re: [uml-user] John Stultz' leap second check program lets an UML clock jump by few hours

On 07/10/2012 02:45 PM, Toralf Förster wrote:
> Now I'm wondering whether it is worth to care about it or not.
Erm - host shows same behaviour ... so it is not an UML issue

--

-- 
MfG/Sincerely
Toralf Förster
pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

Gmane