14 May 2012 19:08
Fwd: Less world-locking in PCL
Nikodemus Siivola <nikodemus <at> random-state.net>
2012-05-14 17:08:16 GMT
2012-05-14 17:08:16 GMT
Forgot to CC the list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Nikodemus Siivola <nikodemus <at> random-state.net> Date: 14 May 2012 20:07 Subject: Re: [Sbcl-devel] Less world-locking in PCL To: Paul Khuong <pvk <at> pvk.ca> On 27 March 2012 11:22, Nikodemus Siivola <nikodemus <at> random-state.net> wrote: > I have (hm, had? can't find it just now) a not-quite-shipshape tree > somewhere that takes the same approach to some of the PCL issues, but > uses closures instead of interpreted functions. (Re-instating a code > path that was deleted a few years back.) That tree is not part of my > threading work. The motivation there was to speed up CLOS code by > compiling things only if they get called at least N times. Well, it is part of my threading work now. :) https://github.com/nikodemus/SBCL/tree/wip-clos-sans-compiler Above is current the work in progress tree -- not much there yet, but enough to show the basic idea. (Could not find my old tree, so this is what I've hacked up today -- hence not very far yet, and virtually untested.) Cheers, -- nikodemus(Continue reading)
RSS Feed