Re: test return code 104 (was Re: sbcl on RedHat Enterprise Linux 6)

On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Stas Boukarev <stassats <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> Mirko Vukovic <mirko.vukovic <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Stas Boukarev <stassats <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Stas Boukarev <stassats <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Mirko Vukovic <mirko.vukovic <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>>>> I am attaching output of
>>>>> sh run-tests.sh 2>&1 > tests.out
>>>>>
>>>>> That command did not capture all of the messages (such as stack
>>>>> restart options and backtraces).  I don't know how to capture that.
>>>> It contains everything I needed.
>>>> So, the following test fails, as in the test itself fails
>>>>
>>>> (with-test (:name :bug-511072 :skipped-on '(not :sb-thread))
>>>>   (let* ((p (make-package :bug-511072))
>>>>          (sem (sb-thread:make-semaphore))
>>>>          (t2 (sb-thread:make-thread (lambda ()
>>>>                                       (handler-bind ((error (lambda (c)
>>>>                                                               (sb-thread:signal-semaphore sem)
>>>>                                                               (signal c))))
>>>>                                         (make-package :bug-511072))))))
>>>>     (sb-thread:wait-on-semaphore sem)
>>>>     (assert (eq 'cons (read-from-string "CL:CONS")))))
>>> Ok, I got why it fails and why it doesn't. The handler-bind doesn't
>>> prevent the error from invoking the debugger, but, my SBCL exits faster
>>> than it can complain about it. Adding (sleep 5) at the end of the file
>>> lets me reproduce it.
>>>