Hi Jeff, *, Is a cronjob stuck? It seems that the archived-at links don't work for messages sent since 2012-06-10. Old links work, but new ones give a 404... ciao Christian -- -- To unsubscribe, send mail to gossip-unsubscribe@...
Hi Jeff, *, On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Jeff Breidenbach <jeff@...> wrote: > Thanks for the note, we'll take a look. By the way, there's a discussion > about using a shorter URL. Would that be useful to you? When shorter URLs will be possible, we'll adopt them, but it is not critical for us. Most important for us is the gain in comfort. People have the message-thread in their local archives and want to point others to it. Now all they need is to copy the Archived-At Link, previously they had to go to the archive and spend time on searching/browsing the archive for the desired message (and often didn't bother to do so, and instead just wrote "has been discussed already, look it up in the archives"). ciao Christian -- -- To unsubscribe, send mail to gossip-unsubscribe@...
Okay, found the bug. On June 10th I made a change to deal with archives containing more than one million messages. A piece of code had decided that one million was a really big number and was starting to write scientific notation to some internal log files. Unfortunately my change was flawed and I've disrupted both the Archived-At database and sitemap entries for the last 20 days or so. I have hopefully corrected the code, so there should be good data going forward. Can you remind me which lists are actively using the Archived-At feature? -Jeff -- -- To unsubscribe, send mail to gossip-unsubscribe@...
Hi Jeff, On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Jeff Breidenbach <jeff@...> wrote: > Okay, found the bug. Great
RSS Feed