Re: More Invisible header fields

Basically I went through my inbox and found all the annoying headers
and added them to the list.

> >+    "X-fmx-:"
> 
> Is "X-fmt-:" real? Or, is it "X-fmt-" as a prefix without the colon?
> (I have never noticed either form in the wild myself.)

Sorry, it should have been "X-fmx-".  I didn't find anything about it on
google, but it is in an e-mail.

> You might want to avoid the use of <tab> characters out to your new
> comment designations. All (most?) of the rest in the file uses spaces
> between the entry and the comment.

I'll fix that.

> > +    "X-Usenet-"
> 
> I'd be curious to see some of these. I'm not sure we'd want to remove
> this entire class--some of these might be useful! Hmmm, looks like we
> already block Newsgroups though, which would have been one I would have
> proposed to see . Oh well. Never mind. Go for it.

This is the header in question:

     X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com

Should I exclude just this one?

Re: More Invisible header fields

Does this address everyone's concerns?

Thanks (谢谢).

Jeff

-- 
Jeffrey C. Honig <jch <at> honig.net>
http://www.honig.net/jch
GnuPG ID:14E29E13 <http://www.honig.net/jch/key.shtml>

? diff.pre-Cleanup
Index: mh-e.el
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/lisp/mh-e/mh-e.el,v
retrieving revision 1.122
diff -u -u -r1.122 mh-e.el
--- mh-e.el	23 May 2008 04:19:33 -0000	1.122
+++ mh-e.el	26 May 2008 01:53:52 -0000
@@ -2407,6 +2407,7 @@
     "Auto-forwarded:"                   ; RFC 2156
     "Autoforwarded:"                    ; RFC 2156
     "Bestservhost:"
+    "Bytes:"
     "Cancel-Key:"                       ; http://people.dsv.su.se/~jpalme/ietf/mail-headers/
     "Cancel-Lock:"                      ; NNTP posts
     "Comment:"                          ; Shows up with DomainKeys
@@ -2456,7 +2457,6 @@

Re: [AVIS-NOTICE] Re: More Invisible header fields

Bill Wohler <wohler <at> newt.com> wrote:

> Jeffrey C Honig <jch <at> honig.net> wrote:
> 
> > +    "X-Usenet-"
> 
> I'd be curious to see some of these. I'm not sure we'd want to remove
> this entire class--some of these might be useful! Hmmm, looks like we
> already block Newsgroups though, which would have been one I would have
> proposed to see . Oh well. Never mind. Go for it.

Newsgroup ?

We should see those, shouldn't we?

--

-- 
Peter

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/