NOCC is a webmail client written in PHP

Thomas Orgis | 24 Apr 2012 10:10

Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox

Am Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:36:52 +0200
schrieb Tim Gerundt <tim <at> gerundt.de>: 

> What happend if change SORTARRIVAL into SORTDATE at the sort() function 
> from class "nocc_imap":

Yeah, that fixes the sorting.

But I have to check again at what stage my local copy of nocc is regarding performance ...

[Tue Apr 24 09:57:26 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: opening server
[Tue Apr 24 09:57:27 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: DONE opening server
[Tue Apr 24 09:57:27 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] needed time:0.095389127731323
[Tue Apr 24 09:57:27 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: num_msg
[Tue Apr 24 09:57:27 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: num_msg
[Tue Apr 24 09:58:04 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: num_msg

Those are log entries from one request to display page 3 with 50 mails out of 871. Over half a minute of delay
before the last call of num_msg, without much computing on the server side. Really have to dig around what
happens during that time ... if time permits:-/

Well, you had the server opening optimized, that is not the bottleneck anymore.

Alrighty then,

Thomas

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference

(Continue reading)

headers

Tobias Mathes | 26 Apr 2012 17:46

Re: Performance with large-ish Mailbox

Well, there all are sorts of nice features in IMAP, therefore it doesn't take so long for fetching by example the amount of message inside an IMAP folder.

I remember that I started to make some research related to problems regarding big folders and with big I mean really big ~50k up to 100k emails. Unfortunately I am busy with another project, otherwise I would have another look into this problem.

- Tobias

On 24 April 2012 10:10, Thomas Orgis <thomas-forum <at> orgis.org> wrote:

Am Tue, 24 Apr 2012 09:36:52 +0200
schrieb Tim Gerundt <tim <at> gerundt.de>:

> What happend if change SORTARRIVAL into SORTDATE at the sort() function
> from class "nocc_imap":

Yeah, that fixes the sorting.

But I have to check again at what stage my local copy of nocc is regarding performance ...

[Tue Apr 24 09:57:26 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: opening server
[Tue Apr 24 09:57:27 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: DONE opening server
[Tue Apr 24 09:57:27 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] needed time:0.095389127731323
[Tue Apr 24 09:57:27 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: num_msg
[Tue Apr 24 09:57:27 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: num_msg
[Tue Apr 24 09:58:04 2012] [error] [client 87.158.40.181] ThOr: num_msg

Those are log entries from one request to display page 3 with 50 mails out of 871. Over half a minute of delay before the last call of num_msg, without much computing on the server side. Really have to dig around what happens during that time ... if time permits:-/

Well, you had the server opening optimized, that is not the bottleneck anymore.

Alrighty then,

Thomas

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Nocc-discuss mailing list
Nocc-discuss <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nocc-discuss

--
https://www.xing.com/profile/Tobias_Mathes

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

_______________________________________________
Nocc-discuss mailing list
Nocc-discuss <at> lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nocc-discuss