SquirrelMail Plugins

Paul Lesniewski | 4 May 2010 21:03

Re: Server Side Filter: convert repository to SVN

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Tomas Glabasna
<Tomas.Glabasna <at> seznam.cz> wrote:
>>> Is it possible to move CVS to SVN?
>>Too much trouble for little return.
>
> Hi,
> What you prefer a repository? (CVS or SVN)
> If interested, I transferred to the SVN repository.
>
> What do you think?

The project for this plugin is so little used, I see no reason to
change.  CVS does perfectly fine for it.  Why is it you feel the need
to make such a change?

--

-- 
Paul Lesniewski
SquirrelMail Team
Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail!
http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
squirrelmail-plugins mailing list
Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines
List address: squirrelmail-plugins <at> lists.sourceforge.net
List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.plugins
List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-plugins

(Continue reading)

headers

Tomas Glabasna | 4 May 2010 22:16

Re: Server Side Filter: convert repository to SVN

> 
> The project for this plugin is so little used, I see no reason to
> change.  CVS does perfectly fine for it.  Why is it you feel the need
> to make such a change?

I use the pluginServer Side Filter. The project is stagnating. I do not know about alternatives. I thought
that I help.

Tomas Glabasna

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
squirrelmail-plugins mailing list
Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines
List address: squirrelmail-plugins <at> lists.sourceforge.net
List archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.mail.squirrelmail.plugins
List info (subscribe/unsubscribe/change options): https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-plugins

headers

Paul Lesniewski | 4 May 2010 22:34

Re: Server Side Filter: convert repository to SVN

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Tomas Glabasna <Tomas.Glabasna <at> seznam.cz> wrote:
>>
>> The project for this plugin is so little used, I see no reason to
>> change.  CVS does perfectly fine for it.  Why is it you feel the need
>> to make such a change?
>
> I use the pluginServer Side Filter. The project is stagnating.

Indeed.  However, I am currently working on a new backend for it and
plan to revive the project in the near future.

> I do not know about alternatives. I thought that I help.

Your offer to help is much appreciated.  However, I think bug
fixes/patches would be a better use of time, as I can't really see a
good reason to change that (very small) project's source control
environment.

Again, THANK YOU for your offer to contribute!

--

-- 
Paul Lesniewski
SquirrelMail Team
Please support Open Source Software by donating to SquirrelMail!
http://squirrelmail.org/donate_paul_lesniewski.php

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
squirrelmail-plugins mailing list
Posting guidelines: http://squirrelmail.org/postingguidelines

(Continue reading)

headers

Tomas Glabasna | 27 Jun 2010 17:07

Re: Server Side Filter: convert repository to SVN

Hi, 
I tried to convert into the SVN repository
svn://office2.xline.cz/ServerSideFilter/
(For my small test)

Tomas Glabasna

> ------------ Původní zpráva ------------
> Od: Paul Lesniewski <paul <at> squirrelmail.org>
> Předmět: Re: [SM-PLUGINS] Server Side Filter: convert repository to SVN
> Datum: 04.5.2010 22:38:18
> ----------------------------------------
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Tomas Glabasna <Tomas.Glabasna <at> seznam.cz>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> The project for this plugin is so little used, I see no reason to
> >> change.  CVS does perfectly fine for it.  Why is it you feel the need
> >> to make such a change?
> >
> > I use the pluginServer Side Filter. The project is stagnating.
> 
> Indeed.  However, I am currently working on a new backend for it and
> plan to revive the project in the near future.
> 
> > I do not know about alternatives. I thought that I help.
> 
> Your offer to help is much appreciated.  However, I think bug
> fixes/patches would be a better use of time, as I can't really see a
> good reason to change that (very small) project's source control
> environment.

(Continue reading)