Re: [Iccrg] Re: Reasons not to deply TCP BIC/Cubic

NIST did a very comprehensive study along these lines comparing and documenting different congestion
algorithms. 
http://www.nist.gov/itl/antd/Congestion_Control_Study.cfm

Thanks
Murari 

-----Original Message-----
From: iccrg-bounces <at> cs.ucl.ac.uk [mailto:iccrg-bounces <at> cs.ucl.ac.uk] On Behalf Of sannikov
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 6:56 AM
To: Saverio Mascolo
Cc: iccrg; end2end-interest
Subject: Re: [Iccrg] Re: [e2e] Reasons not to deply TCP BIC/Cubic

Hello. 

I'm not so familiar with CUBIC, but it is really aggressive.
And as far as I know Linux implementation is little bit differ from the original.
Did have original version same problems?

--
With best regards, Alexander Sannikov.

On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 13:08:05 +0100, Saverio Mascolo <saverio.mascolo <at> gmail.com> wrote:
> yes!
> 
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Michael Welzl  wrote:
>  This should really go to ICCRG, I'd say (added to recipients). May I
ask
> to continue this (interesting!) discussion there?