Norman Rasmussen | 3 Dec 2005 23:17
Picon
Favicon
Gravatar

Re: [ANN] Johnny Talker - revolution in creation of VoIP-based applications?

As a matter of interest, how easy would it be to fit Jonny Talker into
Psi (or any other app) and make it work with non-Jonny Talker
implementations?

i.e. do you need Jonny Talker at both ends, or is it any IAX client? 
How will IAX 'fit' into the xmpp voip model I wonder.

On 12/3/05, Marcin Zajączkowski <mszpak@...> wrote:
> Kevin Smith wrote:
> > On 2 Dec 2005, at 21:03, Marcin Zajączkowski wrote:
> >>Because I didn't get any answer I have one question, why?
> >
> > It passed me by.
> > I've now had a look at the webpage and it's not clear to me how this
> > fits into the jabber voice standards, either the depricated TINS, or
> > the new Jingle spec.
>
> This means that my message was too general.
> My first idea was to add VoIP functionality to Psi. But after some
> ponder upon it, I realized that there is too many Jabber clients whose
> can't talk each other. So I decided to make something "bigger" - the
> tool (back-end) which allows to fast and easy write VoiP client or add
> that functionality to for example Jabber client and all those software
> would be compatible!
> I chose solution not based on Jabber - IAX protocol, to widen potential
> applications. Johnny Talker is something more that another VoIP library.
> Due to its dual form, developer of final VoIP application is isolated
> from VoIP (I know it's little strange). You don't need to have VoIP
> knowledge to write (fast & easy) your own softphone.
>
(Continue reading)


Gmane