2 Jul 2010 09:35
Re: libssh2: Ported to UC Linux ?
Hi Paul, Paul Romero wrote: > First, thank you for the quick and detailed reply and be assured > the difference between SSH and SASL is clear to me. Great! > Also, I must emphasize that my interest is in the SSH-2 component > subset required to support SFTP rather than SSH. Ah, sorry for being a bit sloppy with terminology. These days SSH version 1 is not in wide use anymore, so I tend to put SSH = SSH version 2 always. libssh2 only supports SSH version 2. > I think the SASL version of libgcrypt meets the minimum libssh2 > requirements, and that AES and RIJNDAEL are the same. That's correct. > Also, I assume that libssh2 can use DES and 3DES interchangeably. They are distinct algorithms, and SSH requires 3DES. Several algorithms are OPTIONAL in the standard, including AES/RIJNDAEL, although it is listed as RECOMMENDED and aes128-ctr, aes192-ctr and aes256-ctr is likely to become REQUIRED in the future so I always strongly recommend that they be included. > It appears most SFTP implementations also use the following: > Diffie Hellman-SHA1, Blowfish, Twofish, HMAC-SHA1 and HMAC-MD5.(Continue reading)
RSS Feed