Ciaran O'Riordan | 17 Jul 01:57
Picon

EC to push for 95 year copyright


The EC have made a press release with vague talk of aiding 70 year olds
whose only income is royalties from musical work they did before their 20th
birthday:

http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/08/1156&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en

Some more info is in Karsten Gerloff's blog:
http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/gerloff/blog/ec_has_a_copyright_day_term_extension_green_paper

I wasn't able to tell whether this is specific to music, or whether it would
apply to all copyrights.  Either way, we'll have to develop our arguments
about how copyright is killing culture, hindering education, and interfering
with the public's legitimate use of computers and networks.

Even though the campaigns against copyright extension in the USA were
unsuccessful, at least they should have produced a body of discussion that
we can now draw from in the coming debate here.

--

-- 
Ciarán O'Riordan, +32 477 36 44 19, http://ciaran.compsoc.com/

Support free software, join FSFE's Fellowship: http://fsfe.org

Recent blog entries:

http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/using_latex_to_make_pdf_documents_with_japanese_characters
http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/links_sean_daly_kde_swpat_chessboxing
http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/links_india_pats_clipperz_freegis_rms_emacs
http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/ciaran/ciaran_s_free_software_notes/using_and_writing_emacs_22_input_methods
(Continue reading)

Alexandre Dulaunoy | 17 Jul 09:54
Picon

Re: EC to push for 95 year copyright

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:00 AM, Ciaran O'Riordan <ciaran@...> wrote:
>
> The EC have made a press release with vague talk of aiding 70 year olds
> whose only income is royalties from musical work they did before their 20th
> birthday:
>
> http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/08/1156&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en

By curiosity, I just checked the law for the performer in Belgium
(loi du 30 juin 1994, Chap II, Des Droits Voisins, Art. 38) :
"Les droits de l'artiste interprète ou exécutant expirent 50 ans
après la date de la prestation."  This means that the patrimonial
rights on their "performance" is protected 50 years after the first
public performance. I haven't see any direct relationship between
the performance and the work performed (but maybe I overlooked
something). (note : protection for the author is 70 years after his
death in Belgium
but common in EU)

Now the 95 years after the first public performance just seems reasonable
but I think it's not. Usually (by default like that in Belgium law)
the performer gave
the rights to the producer... There is also a specific case where the performer
receive money for non-cultural activities but the amount of money is
calculated by the producer ;-) I think if they really want to help the performer
they should already concentrate on that part and not on extending period that
won't directly benefit to the performer.

Maybe we should try to find the historical reason for those neighbouring rights
and see the exact logic (if there is any) for the period. At least to
(Continue reading)

Florian Weimer | 17 Jul 16:03
Picon

Re: EC to push for 95 year copyright

* Ciaran O'Riordan:

> The EC have made a press release with vague talk of aiding 70 year olds
> whose only income is royalties from musical work they did before their 20th
> birthday:
>
> http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/08/1156&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
>
> Some more info is in Karsten Gerloff's blog:
> http://fsfe.org/en/fellows/gerloff/blog/ec_has_a_copyright_day_term_extension_green_paper
>
> I wasn't able to tell whether this is specific to music, or whether it would
> apply to all copyrights.

It's specific to performances and reproduction, I think, not copyright
on original works.

A litmus test would be to press for something like "50 years after
performance, or 25 years after death of the performer, whichever comes
last".  If they're really concerned with the artists' wellbeing, this
should be totally acceptable.

Gmane