Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Query on multiple language using search api (Geert Josten)
Hi Mike,
I don't think that works in 4.1.
For:
xquery version "1.0-ml";
import module namespace search = "http://marklogic.com/appservices/search"
at "/MarkLogic/appservices/search/search.xqy";
search:parse('stemmed:creditor AND blue',
<options xmlns="http://marklogic.com/appservices/search">
<constraint name="stemmed">
<word>
<term-option>stemmed</term-option>
</word>
</constraint>
</options>)
==>
<cts:and-query qtextjoin="AND" strength="20" xmlns:cts="http://marklogic.com/cts">
<cts:word-query qtextref="cts:text">
<cts:text>blue</cts:text>
</cts:word-query>
</cts:and-query>
I guess that this type of constraint syntax is not "understood" in 4.1?
David
-----Original Message-----
From: general-bounces@...
[mailto:general-bounces@...] On Behalf Of
Michael Blakeley
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:59 PM
To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion
Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Query on multiple language using search api (Geert Josten)
Here's what I tried, which seems to work using 6.0-1.1:
import module namespace search = "http://marklogic.com/appservices/search"
at "/MarkLogic/appservices/search/search.xqy";
search:parse(
'blue AND green AND stemmed:ran',
<options xmlns="http://marklogic.com/appservices/search">
<constraint name="stemmed">
<word><term-option>stemmed</term-option></word></constraint></options>)
=>
<cts:and-query qtextjoin="AND" strength="20" qtextgroup="( )" xmlns:cts="http://marklogic.com/cts">
<cts:word-query qtextref="cts:text">
<cts:text>blue</cts:text>
</cts:word-query>
<cts:word-query qtextref="cts:text">
<cts:text>green</cts:text>
</cts:word-query>
<cts:word-query qtextpre="stemmed:" qtextref="cts:annotation">
<cts:annotation qtextref="following-sibling::cts:text"/>
<cts:text>ran</cts:text>
<cts:option>stemmed</cts:option>
</cts:word-query>
</cts:and-query>
-- Mike
On 17 Oct 2012, at 09:08 , "Steiner, David J. (LNG-DAY)"
<David.J.Steiner@...> wrote:
> Here's a similar situation:
> Using 4.1,
> I have an unstemmed database. However the user searching it occasionally know she/he wants to search for
the stemmed version of one of their terms.
> The "term" option applies to all terms in a document and the constraint would only apply to specific
element(s) for value or word.
>
> I want to do something like allow: blue AND green AND stemmed:ran That
> is, I want to search the entire document for unstemmed versions of "blue" and "green" and the stemmed
version of "ran."
>
> However, I'm not really seeing how to construct that constraint without simply listing all elements of a
document in the constraint.
>
> <options xmlns="http://marklogic.com/appservices/search">
> <constraint name="stemmed">
> <word>
> <term-option>stemmed</term-option>
> <element name="my-element1"/>
> </word>
> <word>
> <term-option>stemmed</term-option>
> <element name="my-element2"/>
> </word>
> ...
> </constraint>
>
> Which actually appears to not be allowed - you can only get one element in word or only one word in a
constraint (even though check-options gives no error). When I try this I get:
> [1.0-ml] XDMP-ARGTYPE: (err:XPTY0004) fn:QName("",
> (xs:NCName("my-element1"), xs:NCName("my-element2"))) -- arg2 is not
> of type xs:string
>
>
> So,
> 1) Does this even work, perhaps in a later version of ML?
> 2) Is there a better/easier way to do what I'm trying to do?
> 3) I suppose I could create a field that is made up of every element then use that field in the constraint?
>
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
>
>
> From: general-bounces@...
> [mailto:general-bounces@...] On Behalf Of Geert
> Josten
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 9:37 AM
> To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion
> Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Query on multiple language using
> search api (Geert Josten)
>
> Hi Amit,
>
> From what I read in the docs, the <term> option (which is one of two that allows <term-option>s,
<constraint> being the other) is not to apply term-options generally, but specifically for
unconstraint searches. So, if you search for something like:
>
> foo or xx:bar
>
> Then the term-options within <term> are applied to 'foo'. The term-options within <constraint
name="xx"> are applied to 'bar'..
>
> Kind regards,
> Geert
>
> Van: general-bounces@...
> [mailto:general-bounces@...] Namens amit gope
> Verzonden: vrijdag 17 augustus 2012 14:54
> Aan: general@...
> Onderwerp: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Query on multiple language
> using search api (Geert Josten)
>
> Hi Geert,
>
> My search options has almost 20 constraints and when i add the term option as unstemmed to be common for all
the constaints it doesn't work, but when i provide the term-option value unstemmed to individual
constraints then it works, why this is happening, is this a feature of search api to provide separate term option?
>
>
> --
> Regards
> Amit
>
> On 17 August 2012 00:30, <general-request@...> wrote:
> Send General mailing list submissions to
> general@...
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> general-request@...
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> general-owner@...
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of General digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Natural language version of a query? (Tim Finney)
> 2. Query on multiple language using search api (amit gope)
> 3. Re: Natural language version of a query? (Geert Josten)
> 4. Re: Query on multiple language using search api (Geert Josten)
> 5. Local-disk forest failover (Danny Sinang)
> 6. Re: Local-disk forest failover (Michael Blakeley)
> 7. Re: Local-disk forest failover (Wayne Feick)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Tim Finney <tjf@...>
> To: general@...
> Cc:
> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:29:12 -0300
> Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] Natural language version of a query?
> Hi All,
>
> Has anyone here tried to produce a natural language equivalent of a
> search string or the kind used in search:search? As an example, here
> is an imaginary search string:
>
> cat OR dog (author:"Smith, John" OR author:"Jones, Thomas")
> date-after:1984-03-01 date-before:1991-05-31
>
> I'd like to end up with something like this:
>
> cat OR dog with authors "Smith, John" OR "Jones, Thomas" AND after
> 1984-03-01 AND before 1991-05-31
>
> (Things are complicated by parentheses, NEAR, NOT, ...)
>
> Are there any built-in functions for doing such a thing?
>
> Best,
>
> Tim Finney
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: amit gope <amitgope2@...>
> To: general@...
> Cc:
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:42:18 +0530
> Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] Query on multiple language using
> search api Hello All,
>
> Can anyone please help me out queering on multiple languages using search api. In my database i have
documents of different languages (en, de, fr) to name a few. Currently when i do not provide any language
specification it returns me contents from only english. How do i mention the language constraint to
include the search for languages de and fr as well?
>
>
> Regards
> Amit
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Geert Josten <geert.josten@...>
> To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <general@...>
> Cc:
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:22:13 +0200
> Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Natural language version of a query?
> Hi Tim,
>
> There is a grammar option in search:search options, but haven't looked
> into that myself yet. Perhaps the documentation can make clear whether
> you can use that or not.
>
> Alternative is to pre-process the search query yourself. You can try
> to tackle it with regex, but it might be more fun to write a grammar
> for it and use the handy site maintained by Gunther Rademacher to
> generate XQuery code out of it:
>
> http://www.bottlecaps.de/rex/
>
> Kind regards,
> Geert
>
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: general-bounces@...
> [mailto:general-bounces@...] Namens Tim Finney
> Verzonden: woensdag 15 augustus 2012 23:29
> Aan: general@...
> Onderwerp: [MarkLogic Dev General] Natural language version of a query?
>
> Hi All,
>
> Has anyone here tried to produce a natural language equivalent of a
> search string or the kind used in search:search? As an example, here
> is an imaginary search string:
>
> cat OR dog (author:"Smith, John" OR author:"Jones, Thomas")
> date-after:1984-03-01 date-before:1991-05-31
>
> I'd like to end up with something like this:
>
> cat OR dog with authors "Smith, John" OR "Jones, Thomas" AND after
> 1984-03-01 AND before 1991-05-31
>
> (Things are complicated by parentheses, NEAR, NOT, ...)
>
> Are there any built-in functions for doing such a thing?
>
> Best,
>
> Tim Finney
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> General@...
> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Geert Josten <geert.josten@...>
> To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <general@...>
> Cc:
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:25:46 +0200
> Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Query on multiple language using
> search api Hi Amit,
>
> Haven't tried, but you should be able to add
<term-option>lang=en</term-option><term-option>lang=de</term-option><term-option>lang=fr</term-option>
to the relevant constraint..
>
> Kind regards,
> Geert
>
> PS: I'm wondering whether it would also accept lang=en,de,fr, but the docs don't seem to indicate so..
>
> Van: general-bounces@...
> [mailto:general-bounces@...] Namens amit gope
> Verzonden: donderdag 16 augustus 2012 8:12
> Aan: general@...
> Onderwerp: [MarkLogic Dev General] Query on multiple language using
> search api
>
> Hello All,
>
> Can anyone please help me out queering on multiple languages using search api. In my database i have
documents of different languages (en, de, fr) to name a few. Currently when i do not provide any language
specification it returns me contents from only english. How do i mention the language constraint to
include the search for languages de and fr as well?
>
>
> Regards
> Amit
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Danny Sinang <d.sinang@...>
> To: general <General@...>
> Cc:
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:00:54 -0400
> Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] Local-disk forest failover Hi,
>
> When a local-disk failover happens, will the replica forest (which just became the primary forest) need
to reindex ?
>
> Also, will the surviving cluster node try to replicate the new forest to some other cluster members ?
>
> Regards,
> Danny
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Michael Blakeley <mike@...>
> To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <general@...>
> Cc:
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:23:30 -0700
> Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Local-disk forest failover No on
> both questions. Forest replication is just like RAID-1. You set up the mirrors, and they are exact copies.
>
> This underscores the importance of monitoring. You want to find out about a forest failure immediately -
not weeks later, when the replica fails and the whole database goes offline.
>
> -- Mike
>
> On 16 Aug 2012, at 08:00 , Danny Sinang wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > When a local-disk failover happens, will the replica forest (which just became the primary forest) need
to reindex ?
> >
> > Also, will the surviving cluster node try to replicate the new forest to some other cluster members ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Danny
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > General mailing list
> > General@...
> > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Wayne Feick <Wayne.Feick@...>
> To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <general@...>
> Cc:
> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:33:39 -0700
> Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Local-disk forest failover A
> slight refinement; replicas are equivalent copies rather than exact copies. You'll have the same
fragments, but likely organized differently into stands.
>
> Wayne
>
>
> Michael Blakeley <mike@...> wrote:
>
>
> No on both questions. Forest replication is just like RAID-1. You set up the mirrors, and they are exact copies.
>
> This underscores the importance of monitoring. You want to find out about a forest failure immediately -
not weeks later, when the replica fails and the whole database goes offline.
>
> -- Mike
>
> On 16 Aug 2012, at 08:00 , Danny Sinang wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > When a local-disk failover happens, will the replica forest (which just became the primary forest) need
to reindex ?
> >
> > Also, will the surviving cluster node try to replicate the new forest to some other cluster members ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Danny
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > General mailing list
> > General@...
> > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> General@...
> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> General@...
> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> General@...
> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
General@...
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
David
-----Original Message-----
From: 
RSS Feed