1 Nov 2004 04:29
Re: Are we done with draft-hoffman-ftp-uri-02.txt?
John Cowan <jcowan <at> reutershealth.com>
2004-11-01 03:29:26 GMT
2004-11-01 03:29:26 GMT
Alun Jones scripsit: > Did you check the commands going over the wire, No. When I say "conformant", I mean that the results are conformant, not necessarily the method used. > or just the effect of whether it could, or could not, fetch the file? Depending on the behavior, it will actually fetch one of two different files, locally known as /ftptest.txt and /export/home/stamber/ftptest.txt. I urge people to try the URI, which I repeat here, with various different tools: http://stamber:stamber <at> publish.reutershealth.com/ftptest.txt . > I posted some results earlier about what I found when testing, and at > that time, Firefox, Mozilla and Netscape all behaved just like Internet > Explorer. Netscape and Mozilla have behaved that way for, oh, about the > last decade, having copied the behaviour over from NCSA Mosaic. Well, FWIW, K-Meleon 0.8.2 (which is based on Mozilla 1.5) shows the same behavior as Firefox: conformant. I don't know what versions of Netscape and Mozilla you were looking at. > Thanks for noting that there are other FTP clients out there that handle > FTP URIs - I had only seen the browsers' behaviour to date, and it's > interesting to note that there are other FTP clients out there that may > be behaving differently. Here's everything I've looked at so far:(Continue reading)
RSS Feed