Re: Definition of blob URI Scheme

Re: Definition of blob URI Scheme

Hi Philippe.

On 22/06/2011, at 5:01 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:

> Hi Mark,
> 
> I'd like to check with you my understanding of RFC 4395 [1].
> 
> The FIle API specification contains the definition of the blob URI
> scheme [2]. Following the registration procedure, my understanding is
> that:
> 1- Arun should reformat section 6.7.1 [2] (or include a new section) to
> follow the template at [3];

FWIW I'd put the template in an appendix.

> 2- Once our specification is in LC, Arun should send an email to
> uri-review <at> ietf.org asking for review (and address whatever comments
> come out of that);

What status are you going for -- permanent or provisional?

> 3- At CR, Arun should request registration from IANA (iana <at> iana.org),
> asking for provisional status;
> 4- At PR (or REC?), Arun should request permanent status from IANA.

I'll check into this.

Cheers,

> 
> Do you concur with those steps?
> 
> Philippe
> 
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4395#page-9
> [2] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/#ABNFForBlob
> [3] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4395#section-5.4
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/

Re: Definition of blob URI Scheme

Philippe -

I discussed this with the expert for URI scheme registration. 

Re (1) - It's common practice in the IETF to place the registration template in the document, but this isn't
strictly required; you could just submit the template separate, in the request to IANA.

Re (2) - it isn't necessary to wait until LC to get review on the list.

Re (3) - It's possible to request provision registration as soon as the URI-review feedback has been dealt
with -- no need to wait for CR.

Cheers,

On 22/06/2011, at 5:01 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:

> Hi Mark,
> 
> I'd like to check with you my understanding of RFC 4395 [1].
> 
> The FIle API specification contains the definition of the blob URI
> scheme [2]. Following the registration procedure, my understanding is
> that:
> 1- Arun should reformat section 6.7.1 [2] (or include a new section) to
> follow the template at [3];
> 2- Once our specification is in LC, Arun should send an email to
> uri-review <at> ietf.org asking for review (and address whatever comments
> come out of that);
> 3- At CR, Arun should request registration from IANA (iana <at> iana.org),
> asking for provisional status;
> 4- At PR (or REC?), Arun should request permanent status from IANA.
> 
> Do you concur with those steps?
> 
> Philippe
> 
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4395#page-9
> [2] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/#ABNFForBlob
> [3] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4395#section-5.4
> 
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/