6 Mar 2012 16:38
Fw: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-00.txt
t.petch <ietfa <at> btconnect.com>
2012-03-06 15:38:06 GMT
2012-03-06 15:38:06 GMT
For those with an interest in the ABNFing of URI who have not seen this on the IETF uri-review or on ipv6 lists, the question is how to tack an ipv6 zoneid onto the constructs in RFC3986, while preserving the long standing ipv6 practice of using a percent character as the separator in this case. I would suggest follow-up on one of the two afore mentioned lists. Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Fenner" <fenner <at> fenron.net> To: "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter <at> gmail.com> Cc: <ipv6 <at> ietf.org>; "Brian Haberman" <brian <at> innovationslab.net>; "S Moonesamy" <sm+ietf <at> elandsys.com>; <ipv6-chairs <at> tools.ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 1:08 PM Subject: Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-00.txt On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter <at> gmail.com> wrote: > Carsten, > > On 2012-03-06 12:22, Carsten Bormann wrote: >> On Mar 6, 2012, at 00:00, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> >>> No, I think it's exactly *not* confused on this point. There's >>> a distinction between the idealised URI and the produced URI; >>> in the produced URI, "%25" stands for "%" in the idealised URI. >> >> Ah, so the ABNF is wrong >(Continue reading)
RSS Feed