headers
Brian E Carpenter | 28 Jun 2012 17:13
Picon

draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-01.txt

Hi,

The draft "Representing IPv6 Zone Identifiers in Uniform Resource
Identifiers", available in various formats at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid/ ,
has passed WG Last Call in the IETF. Before it's submitted
to the IESG, we'd appreciate comments from this list. If you
happen to have seen an earlier version, please do look at the
latest one (-01) which is substantially different.

Please keep the CC's intact or add a CC to <ipv6 <at> ietf.org>.

Also please comment before July 4.

Thanks
   Brian Carpenter
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Martin J. Dürst | 2 Jul 2012 11:17
Picon
Gravatar

Re: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-01.txt

Hello Brian,

I have read this, and it looks "good enough" to me. It's the second time 
we have to formally update URI syntax because of IPv6, I hope it's the 
last time :-).

Regards,    Martin.

On 2012/06/29 0:13, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The draft "Representing IPv6 Zone Identifiers in Uniform Resource
> Identifiers", available in various formats at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid/ ,
> has passed WG Last Call in the IETF. Before it's submitted
> to the IESG, we'd appreciate comments from this list. If you
> happen to have seen an earlier version, please do look at the
> latest one (-01) which is substantially different.
>
> Please keep the CC's intact or add a CC to<ipv6 <at> ietf.org>.
>
> Also please comment before July 4.
>
> Thanks
>     Brian Carpenter
>
>
>
>
>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Brian E Carpenter | 3 Jul 2012 01:29
Picon

Re: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-01.txt

On 2012-07-02 10:17, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
> Hello Brian,
> 
> I have read this, and it looks "good enough" to me. It's the second time
> we have to formally update URI syntax because of IPv6, I hope it's the
> last time :-).

Thanks Martin.

I also hope it's the last time. This gap was noticed (for the second time)
due to people actually installing and debugging IPv6, so I suppose it
corresponds to the "running code" motto.

   Brian

> Regards,    Martin.
> 
> On 2012/06/29 0:13, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The draft "Representing IPv6 Zone Identifiers in Uniform Resource
>> Identifiers", available in various formats at
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid/ ,
>> has passed WG Last Call in the IETF. Before it's submitted
>> to the IESG, we'd appreciate comments from this list. If you
>> happen to have seen an earlier version, please do look at the
>> latest one (-01) which is substantially different.
>>
>> Please keep the CC's intact or add a CC to<ipv6 <at> ietf.org>.
>>
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Noah Mendelsohn | 3 Jul 2012 01:50
Favicon

Fwd: Re: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-01.txt

Of possible interest to the TAG, as it represents a proposed (if modest) 
update to RFC 3986.

Noah

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-01.txt
Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 23:29:43 +0000
Resent-From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh <at> w3.org>
Resent-To: public-iri <public-iri <at> w3.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:29:37 -0400
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter <at> gmail.com>
Organization: World Wide Web Consortium
To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst <at> it.aoyama.ac.jp>
CC: uri <at> w3.org,  draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid <at> tools.ietf.org, 
6man-chairs <at> tools.ietf.org

On 2012-07-02 10:17, Martin J. Dürst wrote:
> Hello Brian,
>
> I have read this, and it looks "good enough" to me. It's the second time
> we have to formally update URI syntax because of IPv6, I hope it's the
> last time :-).

Thanks Martin.

I also hope it's the last time. This gap was noticed (for the second time)
due to people actually installing and debugging IPv6, so I suppose it
corresponds to the "running code" motto.
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |

Gmane