6 Aug 2012 03:58
Re: Cygstart bug: doesn't keep command line arguments intact
John Wiersba <jrw32982 <at> yahoo.com>
2012-08-06 01:58:28 GMT
2012-08-06 01:58:28 GMT
Thanks for your reply, Barry. Yes, it seems that way to me, too. But that seems wrong. I would think that cygstart should pass arg1 as arg1 to the specified command (winword.exe in my example). That's certainly the way it works in the unix/linux world and cygstart should be considered as an (emulated) unix command, right? If cygstart were a Windows command I would expect such behavior, but from an (emulated) unix/linux command, I expect the arguments to be kept intact. In any case, it makes it awkward to run the command I mentioned, because I have to parse the arguments myself and perform awkward substitutions on them. -- John P.S. I don't know why, but my reply kept getting rejected as spam by cygwin.org's filters, even though I was using yahoo's "plain text" mode: Remote host said: 552 spam score exceeded threshold (#5.6.1) [BODY] >> From: "Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E]" <BBuchbinder <at> niaid.nih.gov> >> >>John Wiersba wrote August 03, 2012 3:18 PM >>>Calling /c/program\ files/microsoft\ office/office12/winword.exe "a b c.doc" works. >>>Calling cygstart /c/program\ files/microsoft\ office/office12/winword.exe "a b c.doc" tries to open a.doc, b.doc, and c.doc. >> >>In the first, bash strips the quotes and passes <a b c.doc> to winword as arg1. >> >>In the second, bash strips the quotes and passes <a b c.doc> to cygstart as arg1. >>cygstart then passes <a>, <b>, and <c.doc> to winword as arg1, arg2, and arg3. >> >>At least that is the way I understand it. >>Subject to correction by the more knowledgeable.(Continue reading)
RSS Feed