headers
Theo de Raadt | 3 May 2003 05:35
Picon
Favicon

Re: vrrpd

> Theo:
>             I see your comment in the mail-list.
>             I need find freevrrpd port for openbsd.
>             I have installed and compiled the file freevrrpd.tgz version
> 0.8.4, but the log says:
> =20
> Cannot set multicast ttl (IP_MULTICAST_TTL)
> I need run this daemon urgently, on my work=85=85. And must be this
> protocol, stp is not valid for my service.

I at least won't help you.  According to Cisco, VRRP is patented.
Permalink | Reply |
headers
dreamwvr@dreamwvr.com | 3 May 2003 17:02

Re: vrrpd

On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 09:35:19PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Theo:
> >             I see your comment in the mail-list.
> >             I need find freevrrpd port for openbsd.
> >             I have installed and compiled the file freevrrpd.tgz version
> > 0.8.4, but the log says:
> > =20
> > Cannot set multicast ttl (IP_MULTICAST_TTL)
> > I need run this daemon urgently, on my work=85=85. And must be this
> > protocol, stp is not valid for my service.
> 
> I at least won't help you.  According to Cisco, VRRP is patented.
Follow Theo's lead. You know that mcast is not set by default right?
Why must it be VRRP? Because some proprietary system demands it?

HIH

Best Regards,
dreamwvr <at> dreamwvr.com

--

-- 
/*  Security is a work in progress - dreamwvr                 */
#                               48 69 65 72 6F 70 68 61 6E 74 32
# Note: To begin Journey type man afterboot,man help,man hier[.]      
# 66 6F 72 20 48 69 72 65                              0000 0001
// "Who's Afraid of Schrodinger's Cat?" /var/(.)?mail/me \?  ;-]
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Alejandro G. Belluscio | 3 May 2003 17:03
Picon

Re: vrrpd

Hello Theo,

Saturday, May 3, 2003, 12:35:19 AM, you wrote:

>> Theo:
>>             I see your comment in the mail-list.
>>             I need find freevrrpd port for openbsd.
>>             I have installed and compiled the file freevrrpd.tgz version
>> 0.8.4, but the log says:
>> =20
>> Cannot set multicast ttl (IP_MULTICAST_TTL)
>> I need run this daemon urgently, on my work=85=85. And must be this
>> protocol, stp is not valid for my service.

Theo> I at least won't help you.  According to Cisco, VRRP is patented.

We understand. But in Argentina is perfectly legal. Unless US starts
bombing countries for not respecting its laws... Ugh!

--

-- 
Best regards,
 Alejandro Belluscio
Permalink | Reply |
headers
Michael Shalayeff | 4 May 2003 18:59
Gravatar

Re: vrrpd

Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from Alejandro G. Belluscio:
> Hello Theo,
> 
> Saturday, May 3, 2003, 12:35:19 AM, you wrote:
> 
> >> Theo:
> >>             I see your comment in the mail-list.
> >>             I need find freevrrpd port for openbsd.
> >>             I have installed and compiled the file freevrrpd.tgz version
> >> 0.8.4, but the log says:
> >> =20
> >> Cannot set multicast ttl (IP_MULTICAST_TTL)
> >> I need run this daemon urgently, on my work=85=85. And must be this
> >> protocol, stp is not valid for my service.
> 
> Theo> I at least won't help you.  According to Cisco, VRRP is patented.
> 
> We understand. But in Argentina is perfectly legal. Unless US starts
> bombing countries for not respecting its laws... Ugh!

who gives a creeping fuck about "particular" countries?
go and use it there if you like.

enough of this trolling crap.
can't anybody read in here?

cu

--

-- 
    paranoic mickey       (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Scott Wells | 3 May 2003 17:20

Re: vrrpd

So you want software put into OpenBSD that will punish users in the US, 
and make it so that we cannot use it?  Seems to be defeating the 'free' 
point.

Alejandro G. Belluscio wrote:

>Hello Theo,
>
>Saturday, May 3, 2003, 12:35:19 AM, you wrote:
>
>  
>
>>>Theo:
>>>            I see your comment in the mail-list.
>>>            I need find freevrrpd port for openbsd.
>>>            I have installed and compiled the file freevrrpd.tgz version
>>>0.8.4, but the log says:
>>>=20
>>>Cannot set multicast ttl (IP_MULTICAST_TTL)
>>>I need run this daemon urgently, on my work=85=85. And must be this
>>>protocol, stp is not valid for my service.
>>>      
>>>
>
>Theo> I at least won't help you.  According to Cisco, VRRP is patented.
>
>We understand. But in Argentina is perfectly legal. Unless US starts
>bombing countries for not respecting its laws... Ugh!
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |
headers
Alejandro G. Belluscio | 3 May 2003 18:04
Picon

Re: vrrpd

Hello Scott,
  I think you didn't read the original. All he needs is a port made by
  someone that was kind of working. I couldn't find the URL. He needs
  it for his job in Argentina _now_ because his job might depend on
  it. He isn't asking to be included in the distribution. Besides,
  when the RSA patent was valid in US the project actually had a
  separate package that had to be downloaded _from_ outside US and
  _for_ outside US. I don't see that for France now, even though
  AFAIK encryption is illegal without giving the secret keys to the
  local authorities.
  Anyway, if I had the money I would pay for a vrrp patch to current
  or something. And obviously host it in Argentina with a notice to
  whoever wants to download it that he shoul check with his local
  patent offce first. Regrettably the economy it's not that good and
  we're stuck with legal but illegit governments for a couple of
  years, so all I could do was a lousy donation to OpenBSD. I wish I
  could do more, but that's all I can.

Regards,
Alejandro Belluscio

Saturday, May 3, 2003, 12:20:35 PM, you wrote:

Scott> So you want software put into OpenBSD that will punish users in the US, 
Scott> and make it so that we cannot use it?  Seems to be defeating the 'free' 
Scott> point.

Scott> Alejandro G. Belluscio wrote:

>>Hello Theo,
(Continue reading)

Permalink | Reply |

Gmane