29 Jun 2007 02:50
Ethan Ackerman on politics behind Real ID and the immigration bill [priv]
Declan McCullagh <declan <at> well.com>
2007-06-29 00:50:09 GMT
2007-06-29 00:50:09 GMT
Previous Politech message: http://www.politechbot.com/2007/06/28/senate-backs-away/ -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Politech] Senate backs away from Real ID Act (but federal database of 'employables' seems assured) Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 10:43:28 -0400 From: Ethan Ackerman <eackerma <at> u.washington.edu> To: Declan McCullagh <declan <at> well.com> Great translations of the legislative process, Declan! Citizens concerned about the Real ID and 'government approval before being employable' provisions in the Senate immigration bill may want to follow closely votes on 3 amendments you've helpfully collected and linked to - the Baucus-Tester, Baucus-Grassley-Obama, and Schumer amendments. Votes will likely happen today and tomorrow. But it is worth noting that NONE of these amendments substantially alters a central part of this immigration bill - mandatory employment verification of ALL US employees against a federal database. (Baucus-Grassley-Obama arguably lengthens time and gives more appeals rights for those faced with inevitable errors, but even this amendment still mandates universal employment verification.) Briefly, Baucus-Tester strips Real ID references and prevents funding of real ID to states, throttling but not outright repealing the program. Baucus-Grassley-Obama replaces the Real ID references in the(Continue reading)
RSS Feed