Now hear ye Canals list Members, BW Mk4 is here, Canal & River Trust is legal. Yesterday 27th June 2012 - Parliament said yes to CRT http://ow.ly/bSATw - Commons See Section 8 (3 ) and (4) and also http://ow.ly/bSAUZ Lords,- Items 7 & 8 ------------------------------------
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:40:01 -0000, "lhpvideo" <lhpvideo@...> wrote: >Now hear ye Canals list Members, BW Mk4 is here, Canal & River Trust is legal. > >Yesterday 27th June 2012 - Parliament said yes to CRT http://ow.ly/bSATw - Commons See Section 8 (3 ) and (4) and also http://ow.ly/bSAUZ Lords,- Items 7 & 8 While renewed my licence today, I was told that the CART web site will take over from the BW/Waterspace ones on this coming Tuesday. Adrian Adrian Stott Tel. UK (0)7956-299966 ------------------------------------
How come yahoo is printing out highlighted full yahoo e-mail addresses in our replies all of a sudden? ________________________________ From: Adrian Stott <subscription@...> To: canals-list@... Sent: Friday, 29 June 2012, 15:17 Subject: [canals-list] Re: Parliment approves C&RT - welcome to the the new era & British Waterways (Mk4) On Thu, 28 Jun 2012 14:40:01 -0000, "lhpvideo" <mailto:lhpvideo%40yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >Now hear ye Canals list Members, BW Mk4 is here, Canal & River Trust is legal. > >Yesterday 27th June 2012 - Parliament said yes to CRT http://ow.ly/bSATw - Commons See Section 8 (3 ) and (4) and also http://ow.ly/bSAUZ Lords,- Items 7 & 8 While renewed my licence today, I was told that the CART web site will take over from the BW/Waterspace ones on this coming Tuesday. Adrian Adrian Stott Tel. UK (0)7956-299966 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------(Continue reading)
On 29 June 2012 21:44, David Cragg <dhsrcragg@...> wrote: > How come yahoo is printing out highlighted full yahoo e-mail addresses in > our replies all of a sudden? Hi David I'm not seeing anything different to what I always see. -- Bob ------------------------------------
It seems to have returned to normal but for a number of messages peoples full adresses were popping up. I saw it too. --- In canals-list@..., Bob Wood <bob <at> ...> wrote: > > On 29 June 2012 21:44, David Cragg <dhsrcragg <at> ...> wrote: > > > > How come yahoo is printing out highlighted full yahoo e-mail addresses in > > our replies all of a sudden? > > Hi David > > I'm not seeing anything different to what I always see. > > > > -- > Bob > ------------------------------------
Brian Holt On 29 Jun 2012, at 22:13, "tinywaterhouse" <tinywaterhouse@...> wrote: > It seems to have returned to normal but for a number of messages peoples full adresses were popping up. I saw it too. > > --- In canals-list@..., Bob Wood <bob <at> ...> wrote: >> >> On 29 June 2012 21:44, David Cragg <dhsrcragg <at> ...> wrote: >> >> >>> How come yahoo is printing out highlighted full yahoo e-mail addresses in >>> our replies all of a sudden? >> >> Hi David >> >> I'm not seeing anything different to what I always see. >> >> >> >> -- >> Bob >> > > > >(Continue reading)
I only see them when I reply to them like I can see tinywaterhouse now but only the start of Bob and David's Brian Holt On 29 Jun 2012, at 22:13, "tinywaterhouse" <tinywaterhouse@...> wrote: > It seems to have returned to normal but for a number of messages peoples full adresses were popping up. I saw it too. > > --- In canals-list@..., Bob Wood <bob <at> ...> wrote: >> >> On 29 June 2012 21:44, David Cragg <dhsrcragg <at> ...> wrote: >> >> >>> How come yahoo is printing out highlighted full yahoo e-mail addresses in >>> our replies all of a sudden? >> >> Hi David >> >> I'm not seeing anything different to what I always see. >> >> >> >> -- >> Bob >> > > >(Continue reading)
On 30 Jun 2012 at 17:39, George Pearson wrote: > (Email and digest subscribers can always see the poster's full > address in the "From:" line, ...) Here I am quoting myself, but I should also have mentioned that Email and digest subscribers can usually see full addresses in the "quote attribution" line (e.g. "On some-date, so-and-so@... wrote:"). That has been true for a looooong time. For instance, I checked a message in my email from Aug 2009, and the "quote attribution" included the full address. (However, on the YahooGroups website, this same address was hidden.) To summarize, full addresses (in the "From:" header and in "quote attribution") are pretty normal in emails and the digest. So it's still not clear to me if we have a actual problem - further evidence is needed. - george [canals-list co-manager] www.canals.com ------------------------------------
Below is the "quote attribution" line from Rogers recent message (also quoting himself!). Anyway, he posts from the YahooGroups website, so the email address is hidden (with the "..."). So to further clarify my previous posts, email and digest subscribers will see full addresses in "quote attributions" when posters post via email, and will see hidden addresses if the poster posted from the web(!). --- In canals-list@..., "roger_millin" <mail <at> ...> wrote: ------------------------------------
To figure out what's going on between full addresses appearing or
disguised addresses, Bob and I need to know several things:
1. where people are seeing the full addresses ("From" line,
quoted sections, ...)
2. how the people who seeing the problem are READING messages.
There are at least five ways to read canals-list messages:
- text-format email
- "fully featured" email
- reading messages on the yahoo website
- digest email from yahoo
- reading messages via "news"
3. how the messages exhibiting the problem were posted - email,
website, or news. (Once the messages in question have been identified,
the posting method can usually be determined from the message headers.)
Finally, it seems to me that this problem is only serious if
the addresses appear on the yahoo website, because then a temporary
subscriber could "scrape" the addresses for spamming purposes.
(Email and digest subscribers can always see the poster's full
address in the "From:" line, but one-message-at-a-time scraping
is not worth a spammers effort.) I ordinarily read the messages
by email, but I've checked a bunch on the website and haven't
(Continue reading)
Goerge asked for extra info:
> To figure out what's going on between full addresses appearing or
> disguised addresses, Bob and I need to know several things:
>
> 1. where people are seeing the full addresses ("From" line,
> quoted sections, ...)
>
> 2. how the people who seeing the problem are READING messages.
> There are at least five ways to read canals-list messages:
>
> - text-format email
>
> - "fully featured" email
>
> - reading messages on the yahoo website
>
> - digest email from yahoo
>
> - reading messages via "news"
>
> 3. how the messages exhibiting the problem were posted - email,
> website, or news. (Once the messages in question have been identified,
> the posting method can usually be determined from the message headers.)
>
>
> Finally, it seems to me that this problem is only serious if
> the addresses appear on the yahoo website, because then a temporary
> subscriber could "scrape" the addresses for spamming purposes.
> (Email and digest subscribers can always see the poster's full
> address in the "From:" line, but one-message-at-a-time scraping
(Continue reading)--- In canals-list@..., "roger_millin" <mail <at> ...> wrote: > > George asked for extra info: > > To figure out what's going on between full addresses appearing or > > disguised addresses, Bob and I need to know several things: > > > > 1. where people are seeing the full addresses ("From" line, > > quoted sections, ...) > > > > 2. how the people who seeing the problem are READING messages. > > There are at least five ways to read canals-list messages: > > > > - text-format email > > > > - "fully featured" email > > > > - reading messages on the yahoo website > > > > - digest email from yahoo > > > > - reading messages via "news" > > > > 3. how the messages exhibiting the problem were posted - email, > > website, or news. (Once the messages in question have been identified, > > the posting method can usually be determined from the message headers.) > > > > > > Finally, it seems to me that this problem is only serious if > > the addresses appear on the yahoo website, because then a temporary(Continue reading)
George asked for extra info: To figure out what's going on between full addresses appearing or disguised addresses, Bob and I need to know several things: I get CanalsList by email digest and can confirm that full email addresses are being received in every post. Graham www.jannock.org.uk ------------------------------------
On 1 Jul 2012 at 9:20, roger_millin wrote: > I have also experimented with > re-booting the computer today and does show *only the messages that I have > read today* changed to purple irrespective of the fact that I had read all > the preceding ones yesterday. I believe the "have-read" indication is performed by your web browser, by comparing its "history list" to the links on the current page. If so, this would mean that either: - Yahoo has changed the links to the messages in some way - your browser history is set to a day or less - you switched between Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari, or Chrome. Each would NOT know what you read in the other browers. The fact that this "have-read" indicator issue has migrated from canals- list to cutweb suggests to me that YahooGroups is introducing some change that results in different links from before. But it will be interesting to see if this still happens to you every day. - george [canals-list co-manager] www.canals.com ------------------------------------
And further to this whole thing, some email programs (like mine), do NOT include the email address in the "quote attribution" line when replying. E.g. a recent post of mine just shows: "On 1 Jul 2012 at 9:20, roger_millin wrote:" ------------------------------------
I don't have any problem with the visibility of addresses.
But I do have one with the new format printing
every
word
on
a
new
line
like
this?
On the latest digest, #5148, I got the first of 7 messages printed correctly
("Nothing to do with boats" from Tinywaterhouse)
then every subsequent post was one word per line right to the end of Brian's
trip report?
Can we fix it? (where's BTB when you need him?)
------------------------------------
On 1 Jul 2012 at 7:33, Derek Gribble wrote:
> I don't have any problem with the visibility of addresses.
> But I do have one with the new format printing
> every
> word
> on
> a
> new
> line
> like
> this?
> On the latest digest, #5148, I got the first of 7 messages printed correctly
> ("Nothing to do with boats" from Tinywaterhouse) then every subsequent post
> was one word per line right to the end of Brian's trip report
Interesting. I received a private email earlier today with the same
problem (though in that case, the one-word-per-line started with the
second digest message, and the display corrected itself after
forwarding the digest to me).
The digest forwarded to me looked perfectly normal, as did the digest I
received normally in a gmail account.
The private emailer was, according to the mail headers, using
"Microsoft Office Outlook 11" and Derek, you appear to be using
"Microsoft Windows Live Mail". I'd be interested to hear from any
other subscribers using these and getting the digest - whether
they are seeing this problem or not.
(Continue reading)
I can see David's address on this one it would normally be something like dhsrcragg <at> **** I can see yours as well Bob Brian Holt On 29 Jun 2012, at 21:54, Bob Wood <bob@...> wrote: > On 29 June 2012 21:44, David Cragg <dhsrcragg@...> wrote: > > >> How come yahoo is printing out highlighted full yahoo e-mail addresses in >> our replies all of a sudden? > > Hi David > > I'm not seeing anything different to what I always see. > > > > -- > Bob > > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > >(Continue reading)
RSS Feed