Steve Bennett | 21 May 2012 05:52
Picon

"Page Ratings" analysis?

Hi all,
  Just wondering if there is any published analysis from the "Page
ratings" widget that appears on every page. My subjective impression
is that the ratings data is pretty bad, but I'd be interested to read
up.

Thanks,
Steve

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l <at> lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Dario Taraborelli | 21 May 2012 20:52
Picon
Gravatar

Re: "Page Ratings" analysis?

Hi Steve,

• results of early tests of AFT4 are here: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Article_feedback/Research
• Adam Hyland recently posted a series of compelling analyses comparing AFT data with WP1.0 ratings
here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Protonk/Article_Feedback
• there are recent research papers I've come across using AFT data, but I don't think they are published or
publicly available yet (when they are they'll get covered in the research newsletter)
• all AFT4 data is publicly available on the toolserver.

HTH

Dario

On May 20, 2012, at 8:52 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:

> Hi all,
>  Just wondering if there is any published analysis from the "Page
> ratings" widget that appears on every page. My subjective impression
> is that the ratings data is pretty bad, but I'd be interested to read
> up.
> 
> Thanks,
> Steve
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l <at> lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

(Continue reading)


Gmane