Re: review of Moore's Peirce edition
2012-02-08 20:13:43 GMT
Jerry,
Please explain what "chemical logic" may be, and how it relates if at
all, to mathematical logic on the one hand and whether it is not
somehow akin to the experimental logic of Mill or Dewey, or perhaps a
neurologically, electro-chemically based version of some sort of
psychologistic logic.
----- Message from jerry_lr_chandler <at> mac.com ---------
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:30:44 -0500
From: Jerry LR Chandler <jerry_lr_chandler <at> mac.com>
Reply-To: Jerry LR Chandler <jerry_lr_chandler <at> mac.com>
Subject: Re: [peirce-l] review of Moore's Peirce edition
To: Irving <ianellis <at> IUPUI.EDU>, PEIRCE-L <at> LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
> Irving, List:
>
> A belated reply to Irving's note on "Wissenschaften" and chemistry
> and a few speculations about the origins of "logical rigor".
>
> On Jan 27, 2012, at 7:32 PM, Irving wrote:
>
>> Jerry, Kirsti, list,
>> ...
>
>> That being said, I for one suspect it is very much possible to
>> discuss logic and mathematics without bringing chemistry into the
>> discussion. For those interested in the axiomatization of
>> chemistry, or in employing group theory to study cristaline
>> structures, that of course is a different story altogether. But, as
(Continue reading)
RSS Feed