Cocoon development

Simone Tripodi | 23 Apr 2011 16:56

[C3] replacing the logging framework

Hi all guys,
Reinhard, Francesco and I had a quick chat on tweeter about replacing
the logging framework in C3 and we all agreed on migrating to SLF4J +
Logback.
IMHO it is an operation simple enough that can be completed before
proceeding to next release, what does someone else think about it?
If there isn't any objection, I can take easily take care of it, just
let me know!
Have a nice day, all the best,
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/

headers

Francesco Chicchiriccò | 23 Apr 2011 20:15

Re: [C3] replacing the logging framework

Simone Tripodi <simonetripodi <at> apache.org> wrote:

>Hi all guys,
>Reinhard, Francesco and I had a quick chat on tweeter about replacing
>the logging framework in C3 and we all agreed on migrating to SLF4J +
>Logback.
>IMHO it is an operation simple enough that can be completed before
>proceeding to next release, what does someone else think about it?
>If there isn't any objection, I can take easily take care of it, just
>let me know!

Go Simone, go!!! 

--

-- 
Apache Cocoon Committer and PMC Member 

http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/

headers

Reinhard Pötz | 26 Apr 2011 13:24

Re: [C3] replacing the logging framework

On 04/23/2011 04:56 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> Reinhard, Francesco and I had a quick chat on tweeter about replacing
> the logging framework in C3 and we all agreed on migrating to SLF4J +
> Logback.
> IMHO it is an operation simple enough that can be completed before
> proceeding to next release, what does someone else think about it?
> If there isn't any objection, I can take easily take care of it, just
> let me know!

I guess you're right with the pipeline and sitemap modules, but I expect 
it to be more difficult for the servlet module.

The question _for now_ is whether we have to replace the logging 
framework there at all and keep the Spring configurator's log4j 
integration instead. Changing the servlet module to use the slf4j/log4j 
binding could be done later.

But I'm not sure if this plan works as expected ...

--

-- 
Reinhard Pötz         Founder & Managing Director, Indoqa and Deepsearch
                         http://www.indoqa.com/people/reinhard-poetz.html

Member of the Apache Software Foundation
Apache Cocoon Committer, PMC member                  reinhard <at> apache.org
________________________________________________________________________

       Furthermore, I think Oracle has to honor the JSPA agreement.
     http://s.apache.org/JCPIsDead       http://s.apache.org/tck-trap

(Continue reading)

headers

Jasha Joachimsthal | 26 Apr 2011 13:26

Re: [C3] replacing the logging framework

On 26 April 2011 13:24, Reinhard Pötz <reinhard <at> apache.org> wrote:

On 04/23/2011 04:56 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
Hi all guys,
Reinhard, Francesco and I had a quick chat on tweeter about replacing
the logging framework in C3 and we all agreed on migrating to SLF4J +
Logback.
IMHO it is an operation simple enough that can be completed before
proceeding to next release, what does someone else think about it?
If there isn't any objection, I can take easily take care of it, just
let me know!

I guess you're right with the pipeline and sitemap modules, but I expect it to be more difficult for the servlet module.

The question _for now_ is whether we have to replace the logging framework there at all and keep the Spring configurator's log4j integration instead. Changing the servlet module to use the slf4j/log4j binding could be done later.

But I'm not sure if this plan works as expected ...

I think we've been waiting for the alpha-3 release long enough. Why not ship it as is and then do the logging framework changes in an alpha-4 release?

Jasha Joachimsthal

j.joachimsthal <at> onehippo.com - jasha <at> apache.org

Hippo
Europe • Amsterdam  •  Oosteinde 11 • 1017 WT Amsterdam • +31 (0)20 522 4466
USA • Boston  •  1 Broadway • Cambridge, MA 02142 •  +1 877 414 4776 (toll free)
www.onehippo.com  • www.onehippo.org  • info <at> onehippo.com

headers

Simone Tripodi | 27 Apr 2011 09:25

Re: [C3] replacing the logging framework

Hi all guys,
thanks for your feedbacks, I didn't change any single line of code
indeed before hearing about possible side-effects.
I agree with Jasha, let's release the alpha-3 first, then adding
improvements in future releases!
I can take care of making the release - any advice before I start? :)
Thanks in advance, have a nice day!!!
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Jasha Joachimsthal
<j.joachimsthal <at> onehippo.com> wrote:
>
> On 26 April 2011 13:24, Reinhard Pötz <reinhard <at> apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 04/23/2011 04:56 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all guys,
>>> Reinhard, Francesco and I had a quick chat on tweeter about replacing
>>> the logging framework in C3 and we all agreed on migrating to SLF4J +
>>> Logback.
>>> IMHO it is an operation simple enough that can be completed before
>>> proceeding to next release, what does someone else think about it?
>>> If there isn't any objection, I can take easily take care of it, just
>>> let me know!
>>
>> I guess you're right with the pipeline and sitemap modules, but I expect
>> it to be more difficult for the servlet module.
>>
>> The question _for now_ is whether we have to replace the logging framework
>> there at all and keep the Spring configurator's log4j integration instead.
>> Changing the servlet module to use the slf4j/log4j binding could be done
>> later.
>>
>> But I'm not sure if this plan works as expected ...
>
> I think we've been waiting for the alpha-3 release long enough. Why not ship
> it as is and then do the logging framework changes in an alpha-4 release?
> Jasha Joachimsthal
>
> j.joachimsthal <at> onehippo.com - jasha <at> apache.org
>
> Hippo
> Europe  •  Amsterdam  •  Oosteinde 11  •  1017 WT Amsterdam  •  +31 (0)20
> 522 4466
> USA  •  Boston  •  1 Broadway  •  Cambridge, MA 02142  •  +1 877 414 4776
> (toll free)
> www.onehippo.com  •  www.onehippo.org  •  info <at> onehippo.com
>

headers

Thorsten Scherler | 19 Jul 2011 13:46

Re: [C3] replacing the logging framework

On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 09:25 +0200, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all guys,
> thanks for your feedbacks, I didn't change any single line of code
> indeed before hearing about possible side-effects.
> I agree with Jasha, let's release the alpha-3 first, then adding
> improvements in future releases!

Should we pick that thread up again.

Do we have an issue open for this task?

salu2
--

-- 
Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
codeBusters S.L. - web based systems
<consulting, training and solutions>
http://www.codebusters.es/

headers

Francesco Chicchiriccò | 20 Jul 2011 10:00

Re: [C3] replacing the logging framework

On 19/07/2011 13:46, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 09:25 +0200, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>> Hi all guys,
>> thanks for your feedbacks, I didn't change any single line of code
>> indeed before hearing about possible side-effects.
>> I agree with Jasha, let's release the alpha-3 first, then adding
>> improvements in future releases!
> Should we pick that thread up again.
>
> Do we have an issue open for this task?

Now we do: COCOON3-69.

Thanks!

--

-- 
Francesco Chicchiriccò

Apache Cocoon Committer and PMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/