Re: [C3] replacing the logging framework
Simone Tripodi <simonetripodi <at> apache.org>
2011-04-27 07:25:45 GMT
Hi all guys,
thanks for your feedbacks, I didn't change any single line of code
indeed before hearing about possible side-effects.
I agree with Jasha, let's release the alpha-3 first, then adding
improvements in future releases!
I can take care of making the release - any advice before I start? :)
Thanks in advance, have a nice day!!!
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Jasha Joachimsthal
<j.joachimsthal <at> onehippo.com> wrote:
> On 26 April 2011 13:24, Reinhard Pötz <reinhard <at> apache.org> wrote:
>> On 04/23/2011 04:56 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>>> Hi all guys,
>>> Reinhard, Francesco and I had a quick chat on tweeter about replacing
>>> the logging framework in C3 and we all agreed on migrating to SLF4J +
>>> IMHO it is an operation simple enough that can be completed before
>>> proceeding to next release, what does someone else think about it?
>>> If there isn't any objection, I can take easily take care of it, just
>>> let me know!
>> I guess you're right with the pipeline and sitemap modules, but I expect
>> it to be more difficult for the servlet module.
>> The question _for now_ is whether we have to replace the logging framework
>> there at all and keep the Spring configurator's log4j integration instead.
>> Changing the servlet module to use the slf4j/log4j binding could be done
>> But I'm not sure if this plan works as expected ...
> I think we've been waiting for the alpha-3 release long enough. Why not ship
> it as is and then do the logging framework changes in an alpha-4 release?
> Jasha Joachimsthal
> j.joachimsthal <at> onehippo.com - jasha <at> apache.org
> Europe • Amsterdam • Oosteinde 11 • 1017 WT Amsterdam • +31 (0)20
> 522 4466
> USA • Boston • 1 Broadway • Cambridge, MA 02142 • +1 877 414 4776
> (toll free)
> www.onehippo.com • www.onehippo.org • info <at> onehippo.com