RE: DOM or SAX?

u were right, Saxon wasn't any faster with my PDF generation.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:j3322ptm <at> yahoo.de]
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 6:52 PM
> To: fop-user <at> xml.apache.org
> Subject: Re: DOM or SAX?
> 
> 
> Argyn Kuketayev wrote:
> >>Are you sure the parser is the bottleneck? 
> > no. I'm not sure. But I want to try another parser first, 
> since it seems the
> > easiest thing to do.
> 
> Easy or not, the time spent on replacing the parser is
> most likely wasted.
> 
> Get a good profiler and *measure* where your program
> uses processor cycles. I'm pretty sure that you'll
> find the parser uses only neglible ressources.
> 
> > I didn't find how to configure FOP to run with parsers from 
> Saxon 6.5.2
> > distribution. Can I get any help on that?
> 
> I just use saxon.jar instead of xalan.jar+xerces.jar without
> any problem. I used 6.5.
> 
> J.Pietschmann